![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
Small Wheels == Low Gear |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Coke ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 30 Sep 2018 Location: MIdwest Points: 218 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 06 Nov 2020 at 7:09pm |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but would putting smaller wheels on a vehicle (specifically the driven wheels) increase the torque capability? Basically the engine has to put out more work to achieve the same distance, therefore it's moving with more power.
|
|
1957 D17 Diesel w/ M&W Pistons
|
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Reed(UT) ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Location: Bluffdale, Utah Points: 151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That is correct.
|
|
2 WD45s, 190XT III, 72 AllCrop, Bunch of snap-coupler stuff. Looking for a B and CA
|
|
![]() |
|
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87632 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can use the DIAMETER to figure it out.... 10% smaller = 10% less speed = 10% more torque.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
shameless dude ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Apr 2017 Location: east NE Points: 13607 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10% less gas milage too?
|
|
![]() |
|
Coke ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 30 Sep 2018 Location: MIdwest Points: 218 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That would depend on the operating range of the engine.
|
|
1957 D17 Diesel w/ M&W Pistons
|
|
![]() |
|
DMiller ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Location: Hermann, Mo Points: 33878 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Exactly, like the old Brit Mini's they had a 3 cylinder engine, TINY as in 1. something litre, they used 13" wheels and TINY Tires but the torque curve for the tiny engines was similar to the old two stroke motorcycles, on the pipe was around 4-6grand and they made economy as not working for HP so hard.
|
|
![]() |
|
ac fleet ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 2014 Location: Arrowsmith, ILL Points: 2335 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
but you lose your traction so there is a trade off there ---- all the power and slow speed in the world wont do any good if you cant use it
|
|
http://machinebuildersnetwork.com/
|
|
![]() |
|
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87632 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
traction depends on what your trying to pull. If your load is close to or more than the tractor / truck itself, then possible... If you are in LOW gear and your already slipping, it will not do any good to have smaller tires... If you in HIGH gear at running at 1800 RPM and you put smaller tires and up the speed to 2000 RPM, then you get more torque and HP......... same as changing gear ratios in a truck from 3.55 to 4.10
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
Coke ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 30 Sep 2018 Location: MIdwest Points: 218 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't think Mini's ever had a 3 cylinder engine in them, they were always inline 4's, even the 850 base model was a 4 inline.
|
|
1957 D17 Diesel w/ M&W Pistons
|
|
![]() |
|
DMiller ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Location: Hermann, Mo Points: 33878 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry Fat finger and forgot to review!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Alberta Phil ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada Points: 3917 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not to "nit pic', but original Mini wheels were only 10 in. I've had lots of them. The one that was the most fun was a '67 Mini Cooper "S" that was highly modified. That engine was crankin' out over 130 HP! Would do well over 100 mph and lay rubber in every gear including 4th. Only thing was, those little wheels couldn't get enough air flow over the disc brakes to cool them properly. Serious brake fade on quick stops from high speed. My first wife hated that car!! Wish I still had it! There is another one coming in the shop for rebuild in the next couple of days.
|
|
![]() |
|
Coke ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 30 Sep 2018 Location: MIdwest Points: 218 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No worries, I think the new Maxi-Mini might actually have a 3-cylinder in it. Only reason I know is BMC had the A-series and the B-series engines, which were both 4 cylinder, and pretty closely related, my dad's old Wolseley had a B-series motor in it. It's kind of like Chevy with the small block and the big block. Funnily, I'm just reading Nissan licensed the designs, and used them as the basis for their engines, weird to think of the impact that will have had.
|
|
1957 D17 Diesel w/ M&W Pistons
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |