![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
1960 Roto-baler with Overdrive |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
wjohn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Location: KS Points: 2092 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting. The serial number on this one is 74430, no C visible... But I hadn't ever heard about the factory possibly reworking ones they had and putting different SNs on them until now.
What makes the axle a Number 10 vs. just a later production normal Roto-baler axle? And where should I be looking at for the pick up feet difference?
|
|
1939 B, 1940 B, 1941 WC, 1951 WD, 1952 CA, 1956 WD-45
|
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Mikez ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Jan 2013 Location: Usa Points: 8535 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Drp asked me to post these pictures. #10 shoe ![]() Usually an tell a conversion because the gearbox still has pulley for second conveyor ![]() Regular axle ![]() #10 axle ![]() Edited by Mikez - 03 Mar 2025 at 8:38am |
|
![]() |
|
wjohn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Location: KS Points: 2092 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mikez and dr p, thank you. I had to go out and look at both of my balers again to see the pickup feet difference but I do see it now.
I wrongly assumed the axle was a later production Roto-baler thing, but now that I look at pictures of some later non-overdrive balers, I see they don't have the two square tubes for the stub axles to bolt into. The front square tube position must have been for better balancing the #10's additional weight up front from the extra conveyor? I have learned a lot from all of you wise folks on the forum. JimIA, the twine knot theory for the dented roof also makes sense. I wonder if I can pop it back up with a little effort. |
|
1939 B, 1940 B, 1941 WC, 1951 WD, 1952 CA, 1956 WD-45
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |