This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
Modified 8050 up for sale |
Post Reply |
Author | |
calico190xt68
Orange Level Joined: 12 Jan 2017 Location: Frankton, IN Points: 803 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 21 Dec 2022 at 8:55am |
I just saw an 8050 FWA has come up for sale on Equipment Facts and I am curious about the 8.3 Cummins modification. The rear end was targeted to support a 169HP engine and maybe rear end is the same as an 8070 which is 189HP but would this 250HP engine be too much for the rear end? I searched the forum and no one has complained about rear end damage after installing an 8.3 so the rear end must be able to take the extra horsepower. In fact, most really like the 8.3 replacement that did it. They obviously went to a lot of work to fix up this tractor but I had to laugh at the splash of green paint left on front rims. Couldn't they have painted the rims to remove that or was it left there to get the John Deere price? After all that work, on the interior and exterior, they couldn't find time to paint the front rims? In terms of value, isn't an 8.3 and adapter kit about $15,000-$20,000 alone assuming it is a fairly good rebuilt engine? Anyone see an 8.3 Allis FWA sell lately? Would this be priced in the $25k-$30k or should it be much higher? I am guessing it has no front weights due to modifying the frame to get the engine in place with an additional intercooler or something up front?
|
|
80 7010, 80 7020. 67 190XTD Series I w/500 Loader, AC 2000 Plow, AC 4 row Planter, AC 77G Rake, Member Indiana A-C Partners, Member TAC
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20494 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If the said tractor is/was never used to pull any more than it did at 170 rated PTO HP, probably no harm. BUT, 250 flywheel HP translates into 220 PTO HP and to actually make use of 220 PTO HP the tractor should weigh at least 22,000 lbs. So, using all the HP and weighing 22,000 to get it to the ground will surely( over time) wear or fail something in the driveline.
|
|
Mikez
Orange Level Access Joined: 16 Jan 2013 Location: Usa Points: 8385 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Any pictures
|
|
DanWi
Orange Level Access Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Location: wttn Points: 1779 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
CaseIH used that motor in the 7110 at 130 hp all the way to the 8950 at 225hp. If a person doesn't want to stay with an Allis motor. It would seem like a perfectly logical swap. I don't think for all the magnums out there, motor issues were a huge concern. a lot of them were running more than advertised horsepower. An 8050 with an 8.3 running between 150 and 180hp would be a nice tractor. I think in an 8010 a 5.9 would be the ticket.
|
|
Ron(AB)
Orange Level Joined: 27 Dec 2009 Location: Alberta Points: 958 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Looks like allis rims on front... Edited by Ron(AB) - 21 Dec 2022 at 6:11pm |
|
405, 7000, 7050, 8050, 8070, L3, 2300 & 2600 disk
|
|
Ron(AB)
Orange Level Joined: 27 Dec 2009 Location: Alberta Points: 958 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm guessing there is already a problem with it and now they're selling it?
Stand on the brakes if you are buying it and see if the trans or torque limiter slips... |
|
405, 7000, 7050, 8050, 8070, L3, 2300 & 2600 disk
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |