| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
AC720Man 
Orange Level
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Location: Shenandoah, Va
Points: 4910
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: 18 May 2023 at 8:32pm |
|
My WD is a 52’ and doesn’t have a traction booster gauge. Maybe 53’ was the first year they were installed?
|
|
1968 B-208, 1976 720 (2 of them)Danco brush hog, single bottom plow,52" snow thrower, belly mower,rear tine tiller, rear blade, front blade, 57"sickle bar,1983 917 hydro, 1968 7hp sno-bee, 1968 190XTD
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 May 2023 at 9:50pm |
|
Dad had a 53 WD and it didn't have one. AGCO parts shows the TBoost gauge and line and says WD-45 only. I'm sure some WD's got it added on but not factory installed.
|
|
allischalmerguy
Orange Level
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Deep River, IA
Points: 2877
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 May 2023 at 9:34pm |
|
This is a very interesting topic. Thanks for sharing.
Pastor Mike
|
|
It is great being a disciple of Jesus! 1950 WD, 1957 D17...retired in Iowa,
|
|
AC7060IL
Orange Level
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Location: central IL
Points: 3340
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 4:08pm |
|
DrAllis, do you think an AC 7060 with drawbar hp at 142, should pull an AC 8-18” monobeam (144”) plow? Anybody pulling one? On-Land plow?
|
|
SteveM C/IL
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Shelbyville IL
Points: 8239
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:03pm |
 AC7060IL wrote:
DrAllis, do you think an AC 7060 with drawbar hp at 142, should pull an AC 8-18” monobeam (144”) plow? Anybody pulling one? On-Land plow? |
I pulled neighbors 6-18 IH on land hitch with my 220 running 170hp. Rises to 210 when pulled down on the dyno. Was a good match. I doubt 8-18's would work so well especially with less hp. You won't know till you try.
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:40pm |
|
I think if you don't stray away from the 5 to 6 inch depth, 120 lbs weight per PTO HP and 3 to 3.5 MPH speed of a WD-45 tractor/plow combo, you could probably pull it fine. As I said earlier in this post, it seems that when the 90 to 100 HP tractor/plow came along, deeper and faster was the norm, which meant WIDTH began to decrease per HP provided. The mighty 220 was 135 PTO HP and was sold as a 8 x 16's plow tractor for 128 inches of cut.
Edited by DrAllis - 03 Jan 2024 at 5:42pm
|
|
AC7060IL
Orange Level
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Location: central IL
Points: 3340
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:53pm |
SteveM C/IL wrote:
AC7060IL wrote:
DrAllis, do you think an AC 7060 with drawbar hp at 142, should pull an AC 8-18” monobeam (144”) plow? Anybody pulling one? On-Land plow? |
I pulled neighbors 6-18 IH on land hitch with my 220 running 170hp. Rises to 210 when pulled down on the dyno. Was a good match. I doubt 8-18's would work so well especially with less hp. You won't know till you try. |
Right. Is your farm’s soil north or south of IL Route 16? Currently my 79’ Black 7060 easily pulls an AC 2000 semi mounted 6-18 (108”) at 8-10” depth, PD 1st gear, fast range, hi button (~4.5mph?). My farm’s mostly Herrick silt loam(#46) & some Oconee(#113). About 15 years ago, before I knew Ed, I had Area Diesel? Advanced Diesel? in Harristown/Decatur rebuild it’s injection pump. Jason Barker Implement’s shop mechanic (Dave?) removed injection pump, sent it to pump shop, then re-installed rebuilt pump. I ask them to rebuild it to stock hp? So I’m guessing it’s 142hp drawbar? But I don’t know for sure.
Edited by AC7060IL - 03 Jan 2024 at 6:27pm
|
|
SteveM C/IL
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Shelbyville IL
Points: 8239
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 9:48pm |
|
6 mile S so mostly 'timber soil" however there is a few acres of black dirt that you don't dare touch wet! I think I have every soil type listed somewhere on this patch.
|
|
