This is not intended to be anything political, so don't overthink the thread subject!
It is however, a growing problem that I am running into often.
I was reading the latest issue of "Antique Power Magazine". On page 31
there is an advertisement by Bradford Exchange for an AC Heirloom Stein. It depicts a D-17 tractor on the front, and a B on the back. Two things jump out at me:
1. The orange handle is shaped more like IH tinwork, rather than AC.
2. The historical information on the back reads as follows:
""with its roots in heavy equipment manufacturing, Allis Chalmers had the diversity of experience to bring innovation to the move to mechanized farming in the early 1900's. They also revolutionized branding by introducing the now-famous Persian Orange color for their tractors. The beloved D-17 model introduced in 1937 and priced at an affordable $500 for the many farmers who farmed 100 acres or less appears on the front and as a sculptural crown on the lid. The first breakthrough orange model, the Model B from 1929, appears here below.""
I am not sure if this is just an honest mistake, or the lack of due care in representing a historical tractor in a collectable piece. It is my humble opinion that if we as collectors and users of A-C's or any other brand wish to continue to teach the next generations about real agricultural history, and its accomplishments, then we must do everything possible to make sure we are passing on the correct historical details to them.
I notified Bradford of the error. They responded by saying that the Research and Development department will look into it.
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
