This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
WC engine Built to WD45 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
deanvanommen
Bronze Level Joined: 30 Oct 2024 Location: Ozark MO Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 30 Oct 2024 at 12:57pm |
Can a early WC engine be built to a WD-45 by changing crank pistons and rods? I have seen some puller tractors that have used the WD45 crankshaft but was not sure what rods and pistons they used?
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WD-45 crankshaft (1/2" more stroke) WD-45 pistons (and new sleeves) WD-45 manifold and carburetor will get you WD-45 HP. Cylinder head is a little different (taller) but that isn't a HP issue.
|
|
deanvanommen
Bronze Level Joined: 30 Oct 2024 Location: Ozark MO Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Will I need WD-45 Rods as well?
|
|
SteveM C/IL
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Shelbyville IL Points: 8221 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
no but i think 45 rods are precision vs shimmed like WD-WC. A little handier
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Don't think you can stick WD-45 pistons in an old WC/WD sleeve. When the piston hits the old sleeves ring ridge, you'll break the top ring or the piston itself.
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Also need a WD/WD-45 governor spring to increase engine top speed about 100-RPM's.
|
|
wjohn
Orange Level Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Location: KS Points: 1954 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
How early is the WC engine serial number? I have read that the first couple of years of production had smaller diameter rod journals. I haven't been able to find much documentation about this but I probably just don't have an old enough parts book. I have seen different bearing part numbers.
Were the rods physically different or did they manage to just change bearing insert thicknesses?
|
|
1939 B, 1940 B, 1941 WC, 1951 WD, 1952 CA, 1956 WD-45
|
|
wjohn
Orange Level Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Location: KS Points: 1954 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Aha, I did enough digging and was able to find it in the AGCO parts books. Looks like anything before engine # WC-13665 had the 2" diameter bearings/rods.
|
|
1939 B, 1940 B, 1941 WC, 1951 WD, 1952 CA, 1956 WD-45
|
|
Fred in Pa
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Hanover Pa. Points: 9209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WC block is too narrow for WD 45 crank and rods to clear , even a early WD block is too narrow .
|
|
He who dies with the most toys is,
nonetheless ,still dead. If all else fails ,Read all that is PRINTED. |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm afraid I'd have to disagree with that. The latest WD block is actually a little better than a WD-45 block for 5+ inch strokes. My puller WD block had a 5.375" stroke in it without any issues. Never seen a WC block that wouldn't take a 45 crank, unless you are talking about that very early WC engine with the 2 inch rod journals, of which I have never seen one.
Edited by DrAllis - 16 hours 35 minutes ago at 8:03am |
|
IBWD MIke
Orange Level Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Location: Newton Ia. Points: 3684 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ignorance is bliss apparently. When I rebuilt the engine in the NF 45, didn't have a good 45 block so I used a WD block. Tractor it came out of was around 70xxx serial, I think. Like Doc mentioned, pullers look for WD blocks in a certain serial range.
|
|
Fred in Pa
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Hanover Pa. Points: 9209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It is what it is , had a Customer bring me a WD engine and a 45 crank , rods and pistons ,was not enough room in that EARLY WD block for crank to turn around with rods on it. He got a later WD block and there was enough room .
Edited by Fred in Pa - 13 hours 12 minutes ago at 11:26am |
|
He who dies with the most toys is,
nonetheless ,still dead. If all else fails ,Read all that is PRINTED. |
|
deanvanommen
Bronze Level Joined: 30 Oct 2024 Location: Ozark MO Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thank You all for the insight and tips. My Engine S/N is W32781K. The tractor belonged to Grandpa and never left the farm, so I know it is original. Has been parked for 39 years, my fault, but I wanted to rebuild and perhaps upgrade the engine. Not sure I could hand crank a WD-45 engine if I built it. It needs an overhaul since the compression is 30-60 at best.
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thinking back to the early/mid 1980's, I installed a WD-45 crank in a 1939 or 1940 styled WC. I wasn't too keen on the idea, as it had a long plate affixed to the block on the carburetor side from getting froze up one time and cracking the block. Someone had made a long plate with a gasket and drilled a dozen or more 1/4" holes and threaded the block to accept them. The customer insisted on using that block, so we did. Nothing fancy. M & W pistons and sleeves from a WC/WD combined with the WD-45 crank, we had 220-240 psi cranking compression. Ran good and never had any issue with the patched block.
|
|
Fred in Pa
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Hanover Pa. Points: 9209 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My customer was told by many it would work ,he came to my shop so I could show him NOT in this block .There is always a first for everything .
Edited by Fred in Pa - 7 hours 39 minutes ago at 4:59pm |
|
He who dies with the most toys is,
nonetheless ,still dead. If all else fails ,Read all that is PRINTED. |
|
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 80830 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
does the "FIT" depend on which connecting rods you use ?
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
PaulB
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Rocky Ridge Md Points: 4707 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Maybe your customer should have gone to someone that knew how to put in in. I've known of many that have done in. Some were not even professional mechanics.
|
|
If it was fun to pull in LOW gear, I could have a John Deere.
Real pullers don't have speed limits. If you can't make it GO... make it SHINY |
|
jvin248
Silver Level Joined: 17 Jan 2022 Location: Detroit Points: 308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
. Upgrade the manifold, 10+15% boost? It's important and an easy mod. Add that governor spring for a little boost. Just keep the engine otherwise stock. Do farm work with it regularly. Interesting mod on a couple of B's and WD for otherwise stuck engines: harbor freight preditor engines. If your engine is stuck. .
|
|
SteveM C/IL
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Shelbyville IL Points: 8221 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm going out on a limb here but I think the rods are alike being that the rod isn't the problem. Those early blocks must be narrow. Wonder if they took different pans?
|
|
SteveM C/IL
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Shelbyville IL Points: 8221 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hand cranking a 6.5-1 WD45 compression would be tuff enough let alone some 7.25-1 D17. Unless you're trying to make a puller it would be more reasonable to just rebuild it as stock WC..
Edited by SteveM C/IL - 1 hour 10 minutes ago at 11:28pm |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |