This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
WC and WD Piston Rings |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Phil48ACWC
Silver Level Joined: 17 Jan 2013 Location: Vermont Points: 289 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 27 Jan 2024 at 11:32am |
What do you guys think of this idea? WC's and WD's use three 1/8" thick compression rings. I considered using two 1/16" thick rings in each of 2 of the compression ring grooves and stagger the gaps. This duplicates a gapless ring. Also, use a .030" over ring in a standard bore and file fit the end gap to AC specs. What about using 2 of the compression ring grooves instead of 3 as do modern 4 stroke gas engines? Chrome Moly, Plasma Chrome Moly, or cast iron rings are another consideration. What's your thoughts?
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
PaulB
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Rocky Ridge Md Points: 4753 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I would just call "Total Seal Rings" and get a set of gapless rings that are designed to work.
|
|
If it was fun to pull in LOW gear, I could have a John Deere.
Real pullers don't have speed limits. If you can't make it GO... make it SHINY |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20534 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've tried the two 1/16" rings in one groove and the gaps seem to work towards each other has been my experience.
|
|
Phil48ACWC
Silver Level Joined: 17 Jan 2013 Location: Vermont Points: 289 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Finding compression rings that are 1/8" thick seems to be a big problem.
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20534 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What you want to do will work, but be advised the gap thing probably won't be what you think it will be.
|
|
Phil48ACWC
Silver Level Joined: 17 Jan 2013 Location: Vermont Points: 289 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What about 2 compression ring grooves instead of 3? I've heard of people leaving one groove empty? What's your thoughts?
I'm running a WC block with 4" bore in great shape (bore measures essentially 0 wear), .010" under WD45 Crank, WC Cyl Head with nice triple angle valve job and ports cleaned up, older WC cast iron pistons, D-17 gov spring, and Delco distributor with recurved mechanical advance. Painstakingly calculated C.R. is 7.04:1. It runs real nice (on regular gas for chores and premium for pulling) but I recently picked up some real nice 1948 WC Aluminum pistons that I want to put in to replace the cast iron units. This will bring the CR to 8.0:1 and the aluminum pistons should dissipate heat far better and are far lighter than the cast iron units. I want to balance the rods, pistons, and crank. I also have another WC cyl head that I will do the same valve job and port work as the present cyl head. While I'm in there, the big question is what to do about piston rings? The Al pistons still have 3 compression rings at 1/8" thick. Thoughts? Edited by Phil48ACWC - 28 Jan 2024 at 10:45am |
|
steve fischer
Orange Level Joined: 11 Jul 2011 Location: sleepy eye mn Points: 971 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I dont think I wound use the .030 overs will not fit the bore rings only have about a .005 range . lower compression rings also help for oil control . general rule end gape is .004 pre inch so a 4 inch bore x .004 is .016
My thoughts
|
|
PaulB
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Rocky Ridge Md Points: 4753 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Believe what you wish, however if your engine has low compression as you say running on premium gas for pulling will actually have LESS horse power. The octane rating is the fuel's resistance to igniting and without the compression the fuel will resist igniting completely. Any engine will produce the most horsepower on the lowest octane gasoline fuel that doesn't incur knocking.
|
|
If it was fun to pull in LOW gear, I could have a John Deere.
Real pullers don't have speed limits. If you can't make it GO... make it SHINY |
|
HudCo
Orange Level Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Location: Plymouth Utah Points: 3553 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
pual b is correct, race gas without compression will not burn with a torch on it and 82 octane will ignite 10 feet away with a spark run the lowest octane you can without detionation (pinging)
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |