Print Page | Close Window

perkins 4.236 engine

Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Allis Chalmers
Forum Name: Farm Equipment
Forum Description: everything about Allis-Chalmers farm equipment
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=26677
Printed Date: 26 Feb 2025 at 10:15pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: perkins 4.236 engine
Posted By: Eldon (WA)
Subject: perkins 4.236 engine
Date Posted: 03 Mar 2011 at 5:14pm
I was looking at some of these on Ebay and it looks like there is a balanced and non-balanced version.  What would be the difference, and which did AC use?  Seems you would want them all to be balanced.....

-------------
ALLIS EXPRESS!
This year:



Replies:
Posted By: JohnCO
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 1:33am
I had one on a Hesston 6600 SP swather.  I'm thinking it did not have the balancer in it, probably cost was the reason.  Maybe with something like a swather it wouldn't matter as much as the engine runs at a constant speed.  Never seemed to vibrate all that much.

-------------
"If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer"
Allis Express participant


Posted By: DonDittmar
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 6:45am
AC used the balanced version in the one seventy and 175 diesel. Dad had a MF 180 with the unbalanced version when I was a kid. Still was a smooth running tough motor. Perkins did and still does make a fine motor

-------------
Experience is a fancy name for past mistakes. "Great moments are born from great opportunity"

1968 D15D,1962 D19D
Also 1965 Cub Loboy and 1958 JD 720 Diesel Pony Start


Posted By: Wade (IA)
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 7:42am

We had a 265 with the '236 motor in it.  It was great on fuel and we never had any major problems.  The MF 275 that was bought to replace it was a PIA when it came to winter starting, but it had the bigger '248 motor.



Posted By: jmm
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 2:29pm
balanced version and the first motor I ever rebuilt.
 
As a curiosity, I think they were used in some hyster forklifts as well, not sure if they were balanced or not


Posted By: injpumpEd
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 2:32pm
Originally posted by Wade (IA) Wade (IA) wrote:

We had a 265 with the '236 motor in it.  It was great on fuel and we never had any major problems.  The MF 275 that was bought to replace it was a PIA when it came to winter starting, but it had the bigger '248 motor.

the 236 is direct injected, the 248 is indirect, that would explain the harder starting. I would prefer a 236 over the 248 personally. Ed.

-------------
210 "too hot to farm" puller, part of the "insane pumpkin posse". Owner of Guenther Heritage Diesel, specializing in fuel injection systems on heritage era tractors. stock rebuilds to all out pullers!


Posted By: Eldon (WA)
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 2:41pm
I have both engines in my 170 and 175's...can't tell them apart except the fuel pump is different.  

-------------
ALLIS EXPRESS!
This year:


Posted By: Wade (IA)
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 3:17pm

Humm, now I know why that MF 275 was such a pain, thanks Ed.... 



Posted By: injpumpEd
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2011 at 4:30pm
fuel pumps look similar, both DPA's, but the injectors are totally different. 248 is an older design engine. 236 is similar to a 354 six cylinder.

-------------
210 "too hot to farm" puller, part of the "insane pumpkin posse". Owner of Guenther Heritage Diesel, specializing in fuel injection systems on heritage era tractors. stock rebuilds to all out pullers!



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net