Print Page | Close Window

off colored tractors oppions.

Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Allis Chalmers
Forum Name: Farm Equipment
Forum Description: everything about Allis-Chalmers farm equipment
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=25689
Printed Date: 25 Feb 2025 at 12:09pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: off colored tractors oppions.
Posted By: R.W
Subject: off colored tractors oppions.
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 10:29am
What are your oppionions on farmall/international offset tractors(cub, super a, 100, 130, 140)?

-------------
In Search Of: 1958 Allis Chalmers D17 Diesel serial #9643D



Replies:
Posted By: Brian Jasper co. Ia
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 10:38am
If it's Red, leave it in the shed. LOL

-------------
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian." Henry Ford


Posted By: Denis in MI
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 11:58am
Cubs are a glorified lawn mower they are about the same size as a allis B and can do less than half the work. A,B, and BN are little better and about the same as a allis B or C

-------------
1938 B, 1945 B, 1941 IB, 1949 C, 2 1938 WCs, 3 1950 WDs, 1951 WD, 2 1955 WD45, 1957 D-14


Posted By: Pat the Plumber CIL
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 12:04pm
Believe most of these do not have water pumps.Depend on gravity to cool engine.easy to over work and overheat

-------------
You only need to know 3 things to be a plumber;Crap rolls down hill,Hot is on the left and Don't bite your fingernails

1964 D-17 SIV 3 Pt.WF,1964 D-15 Ser II 3pt.WF ,1960 D-17 SI NF,1956 WD 45 WF.


Posted By: 427435
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 12:18pm
Depends on what you want them for.  A lot of them were sold.  As far as the thermo cooling system, I did a lot of cultivating with a C in the 50's that had such a system.  There were never any cooling issues.  Of course, it was pretty new then.

-------------
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.


Posted By: Claus
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 4:07pm
Even the Cub Lowboys of the 1970's had the same motor with no water pump, also were lacking on power.  Only 17 or 18hp.


Posted By: Bill Long
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 4:34pm
RW,  The Cub is comprable to the G in power not the B.  The Super A and the others you mentioned are in the category with the B-C and CA.  As said above it depends on what you want them for.  Light work, cultivating, lawn mowing, fine.  They all have excellent hyds.  They have been around for years and have an excellent reputation. Just be careful if you have hilly land.  
In Maryland the offset IH tractors were used in tobacco cultivation i southern MD.
Remember, the G and a number of two cyl John Deeres have a thermo sypon system with no water pump.  They worked fine.
Don't forget to check for implements that come with them or are available for your use.
Hope this is some help.
Good Luck!
Bill Long
ps:  I still think my favorate - the AC B - is the very best.  Cub won't pull the "hat off your head".  We always did very well against the A and later models.


Posted By: Hartland Farm
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 4:50pm
The B AC, G AC, C AC (for two row), and the sidewinder Internationals (140 ect.) are the best cultivating tractors ever made. Being in tobacco country you see a lot of 140's still at work around here but not so much the ACs. I've been many a mile on a B in a tobacco patch. The International are better for seeing the row (except the G) but I never liked making a right turn on a left handed hill. As far at the Cubs and more so the Cub Lowboys they are not much of a tractor but they are cute at heck and the kids like to drive mine.  Joe (TN)


Posted By: Denis in MI
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 5:12pm
I have a regular height cub that looks like that one and all I use it for is garden work

-------------
1938 B, 1945 B, 1941 IB, 1949 C, 2 1938 WCs, 3 1950 WDs, 1951 WD, 2 1955 WD45, 1957 D-14


Posted By: DSeries4
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2011 at 10:17pm
I have an excellent 2 owner 1961 Farmall 140 for sale if anyone is interested.  Has brand new tires on the rear along with many attachments.  Has not been used in 4 years - taking up space in the barn.  Need to make room for more orange!


-------------
'49 G, '54 WD45, '55 CA, '56 WD45D, '57 WD45, '58 D14, '59 D14, '60 D14, '61 D15D, '66 D15II, '66 D21II, '67 D17IV, '67 D17IVD, '67 190XTD, '73 620, '76 185, '77 175, '84 8030, '85 6080


Posted By: wfmurray
Date Posted: 14 Feb 2011 at 9:35am
A few post back you may have read where we cultivated 50 acres with a cub  one year. Cub and AC-G had close to same cu in engine . The farmall A Super A  ,140 and so on had a thick rear wheel on right side so were not of balanced as might apear . Lift system was great .Constance  lift pluse down presure.Uncle had  Super A  and he pulled 2-12 oliver trailor plow with it .I am a A C person but i know more than one case where farmall was bought over AC  mostly because of lift.


Posted By: rickwsomd
Date Posted: 14 Feb 2011 at 12:41pm
I grew up on Farmalls/Internationals.  As Bill stated, here in Southern Maryland, there were tons of them sold for tobacco farming.  I started out cultivating with a Farmall B with handlift cultivators on it.  Also had a Super A, two Cubs and a 140.  Still have the B, 140 and Yellow cub.  They were great cultivating tractors.  We never had any trouble with them and the hydraulics were nice.  Cubs and B had thermo syphon cooling system and never had an ounce of trouble with them, even in the middle of the summer.  As wfmurray states as well, the offsets had a heavy cast rear wheel on the right side and pressed steel on the left.  They were pretty stable, but you had to use some sense when driving them as far as hill sides go.  We has some a fairly hilly fields, but never had a problem.  Take Care, Rick W.

-------------
Rick W.(So.MD)


Posted By: Good
Date Posted: 14 Feb 2011 at 1:07pm
I put a clutch and throwout bushing in a red cub it was fairly easy. The little motor was a smooth sewing maching. Fun to drive if you didn't have to get on and off all the time the guy had a middle blade on it. He said the same blade will go on front or middle and had a mounted single bottom plow for the back. The carbon fiber throwout bushing at $80 was not there better Idea and I found out later they have a bearing available now. I don't know why they didn't tell me at the IH dealer.

-------------
B212,716,two 314H's,WC,WD,D19,190XT


Posted By: Reeseholler
Date Posted: 14 Feb 2011 at 1:49pm
Can't help you out with the smaller ones. My friend has an A but other than that, nobody around here really has small ones that I know of. I drove my friends A once and couldn't get onto both sets of pedals being on the same side. Think I'm going to turn him down next time lol


Posted By: DonDittmar
Date Posted: 15 Feb 2011 at 7:17am
I own a 65 Cub Lo-Boy. It isnt much of a tractor, but then again it wasnt designed to be much of a tractor. Not the easiest tractor to get on/off, but easy to haul. It is said that a Cub is 2/3 of an A. The C60 engine is smooth, a good runner. Nice to haul the wagon around in the spring while raking the lawn. I know they technically are less HP then your average lawnmower today, but my cub will out-pull my dad's new JD 26HP rider. Less HP, but more weight and better traction

-------------
Experience is a fancy name for past mistakes. "Great moments are born from great opportunity"

1968 D15D,1962 D19D
Also 1965 Cub Loboy and 1958 JD 720 Diesel Pony Start


Posted By: Adam Stratton
Date Posted: 15 Feb 2011 at 7:46am
I had an A Farmall for a long time and it was a really nice little tractor to run an auger with.  It was offset, which would have been bad for a bush-hog or mower, but got the tractor out of the trucks way.  Like the others have said, it was a smooth running tractor and barely used any fuel.  


Posted By: John WV
Date Posted: 15 Feb 2011 at 11:37am
I have a super a and love it . Dad brought it new in 1951 and does all my cultivating  with it  Now that I plant 1,000 lbs. of potatos every year  it does everything I need to do for them.


Posted By: Bull
Date Posted: 15 Feb 2011 at 3:09pm
I used to mow 2 acres with a Farmall A. Then I stepped up to the Allis CA. The A was OK but the 60" mower was more than enough for it. 



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net