liquid ballast and pulling tire pressure
Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Other Topics
Forum Name: Pulling Forum
Forum Description: Forum dedicated to Tractor and Garden Pulling
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=159325
Printed Date: 27 Nov 2024 at 8:39am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: liquid ballast and pulling tire pressure
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Subject: liquid ballast and pulling tire pressure
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2019 at 8:57pm
Getting the most bite out of 13-6 24s on a CA at 3.5 MPH in the #3000 class. Stock engine.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 5:04am
How many RPM does a Stock CA turn up wide open in first gear ?
|
Posted By: AaronSEIA
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 2:11pm
They were rated at 1650 and it looks like 1800 no load wide open. As for pressure, I'm not sure fluid makes a difference other than the volume of air needed. I'd say the same pressure as a non filled tire. AaronSEIA
|
Posted By: LouSWPA
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 4:21pm
I'm going to go out on a limb here.....perhaps embarrass myself.....again, but I would think the pressure would vary depending on where the pressure is measured. Unlike an air filled tire, the pressure on the inside of the tire will increase, the further the down it is measured, in other words, if the valve stem is at six o'clock, it will be higher pressure than if it is at twelve o'clock. This would be due to the column of 'ballast' above the measure point has mass, so you are measuring the pressure of the air in the tire, plus the weight of the ballast at the point of measurement.
how significant it would be I have no idea
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 8:40pm
a interesting theory. When pulling Farm Stock Liquid Ballast for added overall weight is same as a driver weighing 150 or 400 pounds. The tractor is considered Farm Stock with or without water in the tires. Same goes for bolt on weights with AC part numbers being considered farm stock options. As a rule do pullers favor using liquid ballast to increase traction?
|
Posted By: DaveKamp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2019 at 10:03pm
Lou is dead-on about water column and hydrostatic pressure, but it has NO relevancy to air pressure in the tire... just how the weight of the ballast is borne upon the ground surface.
The more important factor, is how well the tire 'molds' to the ground surface.
Remember when there were only steel wheels... rubber tires came out, and they exhibited more tractive effort for a given horsepower, than a steel wheel? It's because the steel will naturally acted as a 'roller', creating a pile in front of it, which the wheel had to climb. the rubber tire could deform slightly, causing it to naturally climb over what ever deforms in front of it, flattening it gradually, rather than trying to climb it all at once.
As for what your 'air pressure' charge should be, the greatest importance isn't ground pressure, it's bead slip. If you don't have enough air pressure, the wheel will slip inside the tire. I wouldn't run less than 10, and I'd probably remove the nuts from t he valve stems, just so I could see if the tube was suggesting migration.
What you WILL notice, in running ballast, is that the ride is rougher. This is because when you compress the tire (over a bump) the volume of air you're compressing against is smaller (with more ballast). The ballast fluid is NOT compressible, so the smaller the air volume, the more a given amount of compression will result in a higher tire internal pressure.
The best thing about tire ballast, is that it keeps the machine's center of gravity LOW... until you roll over, the weight is always on the BOTTOM side of the tire!
That being said, I run liquid ballast in my 'little' puller... it's not an Allis... it's a Cub Cadet 109, with a stock engine i rebuilt. Tires are about 2/3ds full of RV anti-freeze. not a good comparison to a large tractor, though.
------------- Ten Amendments, Ten Commandments, and one Golden Rule solve most every problem. Citrus hand-cleaner with Pumice does the rest.
|
Posted By: Tbone95
Date Posted: 26 Mar 2019 at 8:18am
LouSWPA wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here.....perhaps embarrass myself.....again, but I would think the pressure would vary depending on where the pressure is measured. Unlike an air filled tire, the pressure on the inside of the tire will increase, the further the down it is measured, in other words, if the valve stem is at six o'clock, it will be higher pressure than if it is at twelve o'clock. This would be due to the column of 'ballast' above the measure point has mass, so you are measuring the pressure of the air in the tire, plus the weight of the ballast at the point of measurement.
how significant it would be I have no idea |
1 Foot of water = .433 PSI, regardless of the shape/width of the container. Correct for actual density of antifreeze, CaCl, etc, and actual height! You could probably tell a difference in pressure between 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock with a decent gauge.
|
Posted By: LouSWPA
Date Posted: 26 Mar 2019 at 6:41pm
Tbone95 wrote:
LouSWPA wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here.....perhaps embarrass myself.....again, but I would think the pressure would vary depending on where the pressure is measured. Unlike an air filled tire, the pressure on the inside of the tire will increase, the further the down it is measured, in other words, if the valve stem is at six o'clock, it will be higher pressure than if it is at twelve o'clock. This would be due to the column of 'ballast' above the measure point has mass, so you are measuring the pressure of the air in the tire, plus the weight of the ballast at the point of measurement.
how significant it would be I have no idea |
1 Foot of water = .433 PSI, regardless of the shape/width of the container. Correct for actual density of antifreeze, CaCl, etc, and actual height! You could probably tell a difference in pressure between 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock with a decent gauge.
|
correct. what I meant was how significant in practice. Me, I always turn the valve stem up to check pressure so I don't ruin the gauge.
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Posted By: HudCo
Date Posted: 26 Mar 2019 at 9:47pm
i was just going say who wants calicum in there gauge every one i know measures at the top so i would use that as a standard myself
|
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 2:51am
Since I find little or no competition pulling my CA in 2500 classes the next step up is 3000. To be able to pull in 3000 Farm Stock I added a set of Farmall A wheel weights and 15 gallons of H2O in each of my 13-6 24 rear tires The math is 260 pounds of weights and 240 pounds of water. I get what looks like the correct tire pressure for tire squat measuring at 12 o'clock at 4.5 psi. I may need to air up a tad for the 3500 class I now have the option of pulling in 3500 using another 500 pounds of suitcase weights at some point ahead of and behind the centerline of the rear axle. Finding the overall balance point of the added 500 pounds is the fun part I just have to guess at the start. Pulling in 3500 I also have the option of pulling in second gear. Terry Dean's Data book says second gear a CA goes 3.5 MPH on 10 x 24 tires. In my experience on 13-6 x 24 rubber I blow the horn in second gear where the limit is 3.5 MPH Next chance to play is April 13 Weather Permitting. There should be at least 5 maybe more pullers in 3 and 3500 at this pull. This new track will be a first for everybody.
|
Posted By: PaulB
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 4:26am
Weight up to 3500 pounds and shift up to 2nd gear with 13.6x24 tires and a stock engine. Let us know how that works out for you, or more like how quick you stall.
------------- If it was fun to pull in LOW gear, I could have a John Deere. Real pullers don't have speed limits. If you can't make it GO... make it SHINY
|
Posted By: Tbone95
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 7:04am
LouSWPA wrote:
Tbone95 wrote:
LouSWPA wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here.....perhaps embarrass myself.....again, but I would think the pressure would vary depending on where the pressure is measured. Unlike an air filled tire, the pressure on the inside of the tire will increase, the further the down it is measured, in other words, if the valve stem is at six o'clock, it will be higher pressure than if it is at twelve o'clock. This would be due to the column of 'ballast' above the measure point has mass, so you are measuring the pressure of the air in the tire, plus the weight of the ballast at the point of measurement.
how significant it would be I have no idea |
1 Foot of water = .433 PSI, regardless of the shape/width of the container. Correct for actual density of antifreeze, CaCl, etc, and actual height! You could probably tell a difference in pressure between 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock with a decent gauge.
|
correct. what I meant was how significant in practice. Me, I always turn the valve stem up to check pressure so I don't ruin the gauge. |
I guess I misunderstood you And whoever it was....of course standard practice is to measure at 12:00 to not "ruin" your gauge. Just saying, you would notice a difference if you measured it. And....they make sealed gauges.
|
Posted By: WF owner
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 12:50pm
When I first started pulling, back in the early 70's, I always found that running liquid ballast contributed to the tires "chattering" on a tough pull. When we dumped the liquid, to get in a lower weight class, the chatter went away.
|
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 2:31pm
PaulB wrote:
Weight up to 3500 pounds and shift up to 2nd gear with 13.6x24 tires and a stock engine. Let us know how that works out for you, or more like how quick you stall. |
If I stall meaning I run out of ponys and can't slip the tires because I have more BITE than horsepower. I have lots of fun experimenting with what I have and can get my hands on for weight classes where there is more than just ME , MYSELF and I for competition. In 3500 & 4000 classes with a stock engine I have picked up wins where I thought NO WAY against these Big Tractors Got to remember to keep your hitch point as close to the max allowable height all during the pull, With a long drawbar I find it is real easy to loose drawbar hook height comparable to how high the front lifts. Ideally the front tires should be able to just float the track surface when the pull is about over but forward motion has not yet stopped. Our club sled that can start a Farmall Cub and stop a 10,000 JD 850 just by raising the hook point on the sled. This shows how tractor hook height and sled hook height affect traction and wheel slip. I have been watching as many tractor pulling contests on the net as I can find. Never seen any Antique pulling less than 5000 class till yet
|
Posted By: PaulB
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 3:57pm
If you want some good competition Come up and pull with us. You can go as fast as you have tractor to go. Our sled is also very easy to start. This is how we pull a 2500 pound class. First Video is the turboCA. [TUBE]DHzxuUUXUos[/TUBE]
This one is the big cube CE motor [TUBE]xxEUbb1qNmo[/TUBE]
Here's both tractors at 3000 pounds. [TUBE]73L8j9b4jdE[/TUBE]
------------- If it was fun to pull in LOW gear, I could have a John Deere. Real pullers don't have speed limits. If you can't make it GO... make it SHINY
|
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2019 at 8:52pm
Paul. We don't have anywhere in this part of the world to pull Hot Rod tractors like your CAs . Spent the last two hours watching both of you putting on a show with your CAs. I guess I will just have to pretend I'm going 10 mph when the horn blows a 3.6 MPH. You do what you got to do with what you got to do with. I cut down and hauled off a big old bushy 6 trunk tree today that the top half refused to leaf out this spring. Talk about putting the 3000 pound CA to the test dragging these big tops off into the woods to rot. She Pulled her little heart out for me in second and third gear. Burned up more than 1 1/2 gallons of gas and never got the temp gauge into the green. After this workout a pulling sled is no contest. From the stump to where I dropped the tops in the woods was about a 1000 yards not 200 feet under load.
|
Posted By: Ken in Texas
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2019 at 6:37am
Paul I'm taking your advise and blew all the water out and dumped the weights. If I remember correctly my lightest weight has been 2440 with 180 pounds of me on board. Plan is to weight the front with the 60 pounds and pull 2500 in second gear. I'm about 15 pounds lighter this year. If the horn blows I just need to cut the revs When I was dragging those big heavy tree tops I was impressed how gutsy the CA is in 3rd gear at half throttle. I hope the pull on the 13th has a higher speed limit than 3 1/2 or better yet none. For 3000 I have to guess where to distribute 500 pounds of suitcases on the behind the axle brackets and the belly brackets ahead of the axle. All 500 behind the axle even with a short drawbar will make the front way to light. I'm thinking 200 behind with 300 ahead on the belly brackets. It's a 2 day pull so Friday I can experiment for Saturday. If I can pull 3500 I will have to borrow 500 pounds more of suitcase weights. Looking at the option of building a extended weight front bracket for the heavier classes
|
Posted By: WF owner
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2019 at 7:04pm
Unless you have some engine work done, you had better stick to low gear in the 3000, unless it's a soft track with not much grip.
|
|