Print Page | Close Window

G230 vs G226

Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Other Topics
Forum Name: Pulling Forum
Forum Description: Forum dedicated to Tractor and Garden Pulling
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=117384
Printed Date: 21 Feb 2025 at 9:20am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: G230 vs G226
Posted By: Charlie175
Subject: G230 vs G226
Date Posted: 11 Jan 2016 at 12:02pm
Does the Buda 230 gas have any advantage over the 226?
More torque?
Looks like it revs more.


-------------
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD



Replies:
Posted By: tbran
Date Posted: 11 Jan 2016 at 8:14pm
could you narrow the question a bit. What are the uses of the power plants?

-------------
When told "it's not the money,it's the principle", remember, it's always the money..


Posted By: Charlie175
Date Posted: 12 Jan 2016 at 5:30am
Say a WD45 Diesel but with a 230 gas vs a WD45 226

-------------
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD


Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 12 Jan 2016 at 8:33am
I've watched 230 gas powered tractors at the tractor pulls and they can really light up. That's the only experience I have had with them. Similar to the 262 in my D19. Nice smooth power in the 262 with good power but no where near the governor action as a 226.

-------------
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink
I am a Russian Bot


Posted By: DrAllis
Date Posted: 12 Jan 2016 at 9:53am
If there ever would have been a WD-55 or a D-18 tractor, my guess is, the G-230 might have been the engine of choice (at a higher RPM). As it was, the four cylinder did the job and probably cost less than a six cylinder.


Posted By: Charlie175
Date Posted: 12 Jan 2016 at 10:14am
Just dreaming on a cold day.

-------------
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD


Posted By: DrAllis
Date Posted: 12 Jan 2016 at 12:55pm
My vision for years of the WD-55 was the G-230 @1800 RPM with an 11 inch diameter foot clutch, an 8 inch diameter triple disk hand clutch and a 7 speed transmission with 3-speeds faster than each existing gear (for in-between speeds) except road gear, a longer wheel base and 16.9 x 28 tires. Could have been a real contender in the 53 HP class in 1953.


Posted By: JoshL
Date Posted: 13 Jan 2016 at 11:52pm
We ran a 262 in a cockshutt we had. They are strong motors.


Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 10 Feb 2016 at 9:58pm
Originally posted by DrAllis DrAllis wrote:

If there ever would have been a WD-55 or a D-18 tractor, my guess is, the G-230 might have been the engine of choice (at a higher RPM). As it was, the four cylinder did the job and probably cost less than a six cylinder.
There were a few D18 prototypes. According to Swinford's book "Allis-Chalmers Farm Equipment 1914-1985" the D18 didn't meet the hp requirements the sales people had wanted. I think is used a detuned 262 if I remember right.

-------------
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink
I am a Russian Bot


Posted By: LeonR2013
Date Posted: 08 Mar 2016 at 10:29pm
back in the day a lot of the 262 gas were put in small dump trks. farm trks. etc, and worked well . Now if you took a 235 head, opened up the water passages in the end of the head and did nothing else you could work the heck out of the small V8,s. It really woke that little 262 up.    Leon  Cmo



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net