![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
200 engine change |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
eggfarmer ![]() Bronze Level ![]() Joined: 22 Jan 2011 Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 14 Mar 2011 at 8:50pm |
Am looking at a 200. Someone said they made them with 2 diffent engines.Anyone know year or serial when model changed?
|
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
MACK ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Points: 7664 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
200 had the same engine from start to end. 301 CI
|
|
![]() |
|
Lonn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29792 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wasn't there engine improvements sometime during the 200 production? Like a bigger cooling fan and such. Seems I read something once like going to a Mark II 2900 about half way through production. I could be wrong. |
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21056 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All 200's had a larger cooling fan with more blades with dual fan belts that ran less RPM's over the 190XT. All 200's had dual eng oil filters and crank driven oil pump and oil pan that held 4 gallons total oil with filter change. The first piece of literature produced had a 190XT engine because it only had one oil filter on it. All 200's had a AirResearch turbo that was more efficient and 15 to 1 compression ratio instead of 16 to 1 like an XT. Copper injector tubes in the cyl head were never used in a 200 and began with the 7000 tractor.
|
|
![]() |
|
eggfarmer ![]() Bronze Level ![]() Joined: 22 Jan 2011 Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the info. My original inquiry was due to a concern brought up by my brother that some 200s were harder starters than others. Overall, I remember the 200 had more cold start problems than both earlier and older models. Was there a reason for that? Also, was the 200 turbocharged?
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21056 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
200's started harder due to lower 15 to 1 compression ratio and higher injector pressures (3450 psi)...they ran better but cold started harder as a rule. ALL had a turbo !!
|
|
![]() |
|
Lonn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29792 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There you have it. The lower compression might account for the harder starting. Never owned a 200 or did much work on one other than repaired brakes, tilt steering mechanism once, and replaced gasket between turbo and manifold once and all that was almost 20 years ago. All 200 tractors were turboed.
|
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |