This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
CA Hydraulic Pump Replacement Option |
Post Reply |
Author | |||
dfwallis
Orange Level Joined: 09 Mar 2023 Location: DFW Points: 633 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 08 Oct 2024 at 9:23pm |
||
It would be quite easy to design a bolt-on gear driven hydraulic pump to replace the original. A plate and some plumbing driven just as the belt pulley (of course with the disadvantage of being still connected to PTO running requirement). Not so easy to duplicate the hold valve and synchronized control of the hydraulic cylinders and the timing/delay circuit (all doable). But with the advantage of everything being routed externally, so you have more options for creating your control/spool system. Not that I'm going to do this (I'm about tapped out), but has anything like this ever been done? Or only front end pulley, distributor driven or pto/belt driventhe only thing you've seen? I think there's actually enough room in the housing to implement a separate (manual or electric) PTO clutch. Kind of the reverse of current, hydraulic pump must be on for PTO to work. There's actually some quite compact, robust category 1 PTO clutches available.
Just a discussion topic, theorizing, no need for meanness.
|
|||
1952 CA13092
|
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 81782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
someone posted this photo a couple years back.. nice clean install....
|
|||
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|||
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20697 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nothing wrong with that. And it's live !!
|
|||
dfwallis
Orange Level Joined: 09 Mar 2023 Location: DFW Points: 633 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Edited by dfwallis - 09 Oct 2024 at 9:19am |
|||
1952 CA13092
|
|||
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20697 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So the fan belt pulls the gen one way and the hyd pump pulls it the other way......looks like an equal pull. If you've ever been around an AC 200 tractor, it had two fan belts on the left (pull) side powering a 7 blade fan at 2400 engine RPM. We never had a problem with alternator bearings. How many hours is a B-C-CA tractor ever going to get at full throttle all day long ??? not many.
Edited by DrAllis - 09 Oct 2024 at 7:57am |
|||
Les Kerf
Orange Level Joined: 08 May 2020 Location: Idaho Points: 842 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
They make new bearings every day As Dr. Allis pointed out, this arrangement actually reduces the load on the bearings.
Sounds like it's time to find someone else to do the work. |
|||
dfwallis
Orange Level Joined: 09 Mar 2023 Location: DFW Points: 633 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I doubt its as bad as he said (especially since he replaced the front bearing with ball bearings, but the rear is still a sleeve bearing), but definitely not going to be an equal pull. The geometry doesn't work plus the HP (belt tension) required for a decent pump vs the generator is likely to be quite a mismatch (done properly). But there are other reasons not to like that particular arrangement. For one, it makes it nearly impossible to use the cultivator implements. Would be really cumbersome to have to dismantle that hydraulic arrangement (as shown) to install the cultivators. My weight rack design will also interfere, but at least it's really easy to remove.
|
|||
1952 CA13092
|
|||
dfwallis
Orange Level Joined: 09 Mar 2023 Location: DFW Points: 633 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Naw, he's a smart guy and does quality work.
|
|||
1952 CA13092
|
|||
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 81782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
yea... depends on what you want... If the Cultivator and brackets are the important part, then keep the pump in the back... If your needing rear hydraulic power, then the pump up front is a good setup... The alternator with ball bearings is a better layout than trying to do it with an older generator.
|
|||
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|||
Les Kerf
Orange Level Joined: 08 May 2020 Location: Idaho Points: 842 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Agreed, not equal, but still significantly reduced. The actual amount of reduction will be an amount based on the tangent difference, which I will not guess at because I don't have actual measurements and it really is a moot point. The water pump bearings will certainly have more load.
I missed that point completely My Model C has a front hydraulic pump drive on a modified crankshaft pulley that works quite well, it was done by a previous owner. Since I am unfamiliar with cultivator mounts I suppose it could be in the way but I am not sure. The pump bolts to the front cultivator mounts. |
|||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |