8010 engine questions

I have acquired an 8010 fwa in a sad state of disrepair. The story as we received it is, “that it leaked water in the pistons from the spark plug holes”. That should set the tone for what I am working with….its clearly stuck!  The rain cap is missing and coolant hoses are off the radiator and it is completely unbolted and loose in the chassis. Injector lines are just sitting in place and all injector hold down hardware is missing. We started disassemble and shows very little water intrusion from intake or exhaust through the turbo.  We drained 7 gallons of water out of the oil pan and the pan itself is bulged out like a football. We noticed a soft plug is missing from rh side of the block just ahead of the block heater, interesting!  Removed valve cover and found rust on the front rockers but not as bad as expected. Removed head and found cylinders were completely rusted. All 6. It didn’t appear the injector were removed and set back in but can’t know for sure as the previous owner passed away 2 weeks after we got the tractor so no more history can be obtained but I doubt he would have been much!  When we unhooked heater hoses it appeared to be only water in the system and the way everything in the coolant system is rusted up. Attempted to drain the oil cooler and the soft plug cover on the bottom fell off.  Most likely from being frozen.  Im pretty sure we will have to remove the block for cleaning and inspection. Took the block off plate for the cam driven fuel pump and the cam is pretty rusted so that will need replacement.  Will be sending the injection pump off to ed for repair as it had sat open too. 

The tractor has an American Bosch pump on it and the cooler is between the filters on the left side of the engine. The spare engines all have the same casting numbers but it's different than the tractor. The m is a 2900 and the L are 649t but other than the turbo arrangement they are pretty much the same.

I agree with Lynn, if have Roosa powered 301 from a combine, I'd keep that fuel system and have that properly rebuilt and set up for use in a tractor. That would make a nice 8010, or if you didn't have any 301 parts to fix it, that would be a nice tractor to 5.9 swap, as much as I hate to say it lmao! 

Is it a Power Shift ?? because 8010 PST's are weaker than an 8030-50-70. They cheapened one planetary inside the tranny. Now if you use 6th gear all the time to do your heavy work, the Cummins would be OK fine.

Parts from any 7000 series PST should fit when it comes to the planetary's. The one they changed went from 4 planet gears to 3 planet gears, as they figured 110 HP could live but 130 HP and up could not.

We have kinda strayed off of the original post subject, but I have a couple of questions on the 8010. Were the lighter power shift parts really a cost saver if the parts weren't readily available off the shelf? Did they have to redesign and make new parts just for the 8010? That doesn't sound real efficient to me. Was the Bosch system a cost saver or was that more for emissions? Also, was a new oil cooler design needed? Maybe that oil cooler had been in use on some other products that I'm unaware of.

Stanadyne pump front plate will require a couple of lengths of angle iron to be be bolted inside the frame rails.  130 HP flywheel will yield 107 to 110 PTO HP....the same.