![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
Corn Supplies/Cereal Prices |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Author | |
CTuckerNWIL ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22823 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes corn is a food source, but we don't use that food source up by making ethanol out of it. Something near 90% of the original food value is still there after making ethanol.
I don't believe ethanol is the answer to our problems either but it beats the heck out of printing more money and sending to the middle east in exchange for more crude. What alternative fuel source isn't subsidized by the government? Wind generators are subsidized till they are up. They might run 7 or 8 years and then nobody ca afford to repair them to keep them going. I don't know how many $ our school district spent putting up a wind generator saying how it would pay for itself in so much time. Well the power generated in the first 5 years won't pay for the maintenance cost so far let alone pay back the original investment or any interest on it. I don't believe we will ever have a good answer for our energy needs as long as the government has any input, which probably means we will never have an answer to our energy needs. |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Rogers ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Georgia Points: 2176 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Charles, what I am saying is that ethanol is not the answer. I agree that we need to stop sending money overseas. We could do that by drilling right here at home for oil, but that isn't going to happen in the current world of politics and political correctness.
I don't know about the 90% of the original food value being retained. I cannot find that number looking around. There is some food value, but it appears to be mostly used in feeds. Depending on the amount and usage possibly the impact can be reduced, but I don't see any data supporting that.
In any event Corn is a staple food crop although people have gotten more health conscious and reduced the food dependence value of corn. As the world population continues to grow over time more people will need food. The fact is that corn is one of the most economical food sources there is right now.
Corn also requires a lot of water. Most farms around here that produce any real amounts of corn are irrigated. With the water supply coming under tighter and tighter regulation the ability to produce an increasing amount of corn will be in question. What will that mean if animals and people rely on corn for food and we also rely on corn as a fuel supplement. I feel very strongly that ethanol production using corn can not be a long term solution.
|
|
Think for yourself and be your own expert. Be willing to change your mind; however, willingness to change your mind doesn’t mean that you will. Blindly following any path is the pinnacle of insanity.
|
|
![]() |
|
ncrc5315 ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Location: Nebraska Points: 68 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Ethanol is a loser.It has to be subsidised to get produced."
And you don't think that oil isn't subsidized? The low numbers that I have seen are about 35 billion dollars, and that doesn't include the cost of the military guarding the oil supply, or the lives lost defending that oil supply. Remember, no US service personal has ever died defending an ethanol plant. Also the supply of corn used to feed ethanol plants is a good buffer against a bad crop year. In that case the price goes high enough to take it away from ethanol and re-route it to food.
|
|
![]() |
|
Gordy ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: SWMI Points: 2533 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
((AND "OIL" ISNT SUBSIDIZED??? COME ON THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!! ))
I think it is the opposite of being subsidized from the drilling leases all the way to the tax at the pump oil pumps huge amount of dollars into the goverment |
|
![]() |
|
ncrc5315 ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Location: Nebraska Points: 68 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oil, without government subsidies would never work either. It's just that the subsidies have been going on for so long, that nobody thinks about them.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sandknob ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Oblong, IL Points: 2456 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rogers,
I call bull ont he 34%. Those numbers have been thrown out for years as well as the "takes more input than you get out" bull!!!! That was skewed data when it came out years ago and is no better now. I at one point had a 99 Ford Ranger flex fuel that I drove daily. We took good mileage measurements with both gasoline and ethanol and with gasoline I could easily get 15-16 mpg with ethanol I could easily get 14-15 mpg so don't give me that crap. We made absolutely no changes to the truck it was factory. I also had an 84 Dodge Ram D150 that I built an engine for. It had a 360 that was designed to be used with either ethanol or gas. It would run fine on either and got about the same mileage either way. I quit driving it due to transmission problems (later sold it, really wish I still had it). I did have problems occasionally with the idle on ethanol because I never got it tuned correctly (when I switched back and forth I had carb adjustments I made - idle, jets, squirters, etc). I got tired of switching and just drove the Ranger on E85 and the Ram on gas. If I were to do it again I would have adapted a fuel injection system off of a 93 and up Ram.
We have a local ethanol plant and most of the farmers that raise livestock around here buy the DDG's from the plant for feed. They say it really makes good feed as it has a lot of protein.
Adam
|
|
![]() |
|
Sandknob ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Oblong, IL Points: 2456 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As far as the internal combustion engine being inefficient. Maybe so, but I don't buy that these little electric jobbys are any better (just a passing fancy in my opinion). Thier power comes from somewhere and I don't just mean the outlet on the wall (have to look beyond that). Anyway get the EPA out of the equation and the internal combustion engine can get a lot more efficient. On the Dodge truck I built I looked over probably 20 different cams and picked one from Mopar. It was a "resto cam" for a 70 340. Well after installing it and originaly running it - I hated it. It had no low end grunt (torque). The power came on after about 2000-2500 rpm or about 35 mph in my truck. I couldn't even squeak a tire, but I could really fly down the highway after it got moving. Anyway I pulled it out and replaced it with a Comp Cams RV style cam (not the smallest, but the next one up from that XE256 if I remember correctly) and mileage improved and power was phenominal. That truck was a different animal after that. Anyway the point of the story is that 340 resto cam turned out to be the factory truck cam for a 360 truck from 70's right up until about 87-88 (maybe even later). I couldn't figure out why Dodge would put such a horrible cam in a truck like that until I got to reading on the internet that they installed that cam to get emmision where the EPA wanted them for that time period. Its no wonder everyone thinks 360's are fuel hogs, with that cam they definately are!
Adam Edited by Sandknob - 12 Feb 2011 at 9:33pm |
|
![]() |
|
Rogers ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Georgia Points: 2176 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Adam,
The 34% less efficient value attributed to ethanol is well documented, so there is nothing to dispute or call bull about. The flex fuel engines are designed for ultimate efficiency with ethanol gas. The extra gas mileage for ethanol vs gas is comparing apples to oranges. It is a designed feature to deal with what is forced upon the industry.
I had a 1989 Chevrolet truck that got better than 21 miles to the gallon on gasoline and a 2003 that gets less than the stated 18. Why? Well it just does. I never have liked that about the 2003. What relevance does that have? Nothing aside from what is is.
When it comes to the efficiency of the internal combustion engine. It is only about 35% efficient in converting the energy in fuel to mechanical work at the output shaft. The vast majority of energy is dissipated in heat. Then the mechanical output of the engine is put through a torque converter, drive shaft, gears and tires. In the end mechanical efficiency of an automobile is even less than the 35% because of other losses. The overall efficiency is maybe 25%. I don't have documentation right off the bat, but it should be very easy to verify on-line with a little searching. I won't be far off. If anything the actual efficiency may be slightly worse.
When it come to an electric engine the efficiency is around 95% at the shaft with regards to energy put in. That is a fact. I am an electrical engineer, and I can assure you with absolute certainty that is correct. You will have the same losses in the drive shaft, gears and tires. The overall efficiency of an electric car would be somewhere around 80 to 85%.
You mentioned that the electricity has to be generated by saying "you have to look beyond that". I have hope for you can see the truth if you continue by looking at the whole picture. The efficiency in generation of energy is a factor in its use.
We are feed a bunch of energy efficient talk, but when you look at the whole picture not just the parts you are fed you see the entire picture. When it comes to alternative energy we need to be looking at sources that swing the overall pendulum from generation to use. Ethanol can't do that.
|
|
Think for yourself and be your own expert. Be willing to change your mind; however, willingness to change your mind doesn’t mean that you will. Blindly following any path is the pinnacle of insanity.
|
|
![]() |
|
CORLEWFARM ![]() Bronze Level Access ![]() Joined: 25 Jan 2011 Points: 114 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
just like dave said. the corn for fuel comes from live stock feed not for human consuption and its still avable for livestock after its produced and adds foodvalue
|
|
![]() |
|
Spud ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: North Dakota Points: 601 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Where can I access an oil subsidy? I work in the oilfield and have never seen a subsidy check. I cannot say that for the ag industry though?
I have been told that oil companies get some tax breaks but fuel is taxed in a big way as well. I guess if a tax break is a subsidy then we are all subsidized to the point that the government does not take all of our income.
Please point me in the direction to go to get these subsidies or would I have to go back to farming to access them again?
|
|
![]() |
|
Mark(MO) ![]() Bronze Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NE Missouri Points: 79 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can't believe all of the negative ethanol comments on this site. I thought most of you lived in the rural U.S. or more approriately grew up or still live on a farm. There hasn't been a single thing that has done more for rural farm economies than ethanol production. Do you remember the days of $1.90 corn, no market, great stockpiles, the PIC program, the farm crisis of the 80's? I am sure many of you lived through all of that. Why on earth are famrers maligning the one economic advancement that has made their profession profitable again. I don't get it. And to the subject of food vs. fuel, field corn is mostly used for livestock feed, ethanol production and the sweetener market. Very little actually goes directly into human food consumption. The sweet corn (food) market is relatively small and contract driven as someone mentioned earlier. And to the subsidy issue, the oil industry recieves way more subsidies than agriculture, but that is never mentioned. There is a great DTN in depth study that looks at that issue. Why are we content to just keep putting foreign oil in our gas tanks? Have you seen the profits at Exxon/Mobil lately? I just don't get it. I am losing faith in our public and more importantly in our farming community. And for the record, I am a crop and livestock producer. I know what it costs to feed cattle $7 corn. I also know what the local ethanol plant has done for my farm's bottom line.
|
|
![]() |
|
427435 ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 18 Nov 2010 Location: SE Minnesota Points: 18637 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There may be a break-down in communication about ethanol BTU or energy differences.
Pure ethanol has about 2/3 of the BTU's as pure gas. E10 (10% ethanol) has about 3% less energy (not 30-34%) than pure gas. Thus, measuring mpg differences is hard due to the many variable things that affect mpg. As far as the BTU's required to produce a BTU of ethanol, there's lots of funny number games being played--------especially by the people who dislike ethanol (read big oil). With current processes, one BTU of input will provide 1.3-2.3 BTU's of ethanol. The low number is used by opponents of ethanol and doesn't take into account the value of the distillers grain that is left after the ethanol process. The higher numbers are from the more efficient ethanol plants and takes the value of the distillers grain into account. Another thing that the opponents of ethanol like to forget about is that much of the input BTU's for ethanol come from coal and natural gas. We have huge supplies of both right in the USA, but neither are useful as vehicle fuels. By using corn, natural gas, and coal (all of which is in good supply in the USA), we can lessen our dependence on oil (and the middle east). Edited by 427435 - 13 Feb 2011 at 9:50am |
|
Mark
B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel, GTH-L Simplicity Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not. |
|
![]() |
|
Calvin Schmidt ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Ontario Can. Points: 4526 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm an invester in a farmer owned ethanol plant here in Ontario. In two years of production we have retired 70% of our debt. For every tax dollar of subsidy the government gets 3 dollars back in tax revenue so its been a good investment for the government. Corn farmers were tired of having little or no profits so we created a new market for our corn. DDGs are a great source of livestock feed. I'm a little tired of over producing livestock farmers complaining about the price of corn. Do something about it and find a new market for your product like we did. I'm not runnig a charity to produce corn at a loss for the benifit of the livestock farmers. Been there and done that!
|
|
Nothing is impossible if it is properly financed
|
|
![]() |
|
Jim Lindemood ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Location: Dry Ridge, KY Points: 2569 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As it turns out, this maybe would have been more appropriate on the political section, but it is here now. Yes, ethanol production has been an economical help for farmers and that is good. Just saying that while it probably can be one component to help us as an alternative energy source, but it is not the long term solution itself. We farmers should be glad for what it is doing, but not stake our future in it - remember tobacco. Provided income for lots of folks, still does for some, but did fall from grace. |
|
![]() |
|
Mark(MO) ![]() Bronze Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NE Missouri Points: 79 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Rogers ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Georgia Points: 2176 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was speaking of pure ethanol. Gas now is only 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline. In any event when you mix a less efficient fuel with a more efficient fuel you end up with something less than the efficiency of the best fuel as a general rule.
Ethanol gas is less efficient that is a fact that is not spew from an anti ethanol source it is fact. If someone tells you different they are the ones telling something which is not based in fact. Company's like GM make flex fuel motors which are designed to be more efficient with ethanol blends. That is the result of design not the fuel itself. That said, I remember seeing an article in an engineering magazine over 20 years ago that spoke of a 50 MPG V8 powered by gas built by GM. The engine had fuel efficiency and turned more HP than anything GM had. It was not in production because it would add several thousand dollars to the cost of a vehicle.
I would like to see a link that tells about the food value still being there after ethanol production. Like I said earlier if that is true it sure isn't an easy item to find. That makes it suspect to me. I would also be suspect if all things that speak of retained fuel value go back to the same article.
This post should have really been on the political forum because it is mostly an issue driven by political forces. Anyway I've been told its lunch time. LOL..
|
|
Think for yourself and be your own expert. Be willing to change your mind; however, willingness to change your mind doesn’t mean that you will. Blindly following any path is the pinnacle of insanity.
|
|
![]() |
|
Nathan (SD) ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Day County SD Points: 1267 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When I am at the gas pump I can decide if my money goes to corn growing americans or sand packing foreign countries, not a hard choice for me.
As far as the susidies. I myself think they should be lowered. But the fact is the gov is spending that money in our own country for something that benefits the whole country.
Do I think ethanol is the answer to all our problems? No. But it is a step in the right direction that hopefully can lead to bigger steps.
Personally I spend way more money on gas every month than I do food, so I am more interested in the energy value of corn.
Note: these are my opinions, your opinion may vary
|
|
![]() |
|
427435 ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 18 Nov 2010 Location: SE Minnesota Points: 18637 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just do a search on the price of dried distillers grain. It sells by the ton and is worth between 50-65% of the price of corn before it goes into the distilling process. If there wasn't feed value in it, feeders wouldn't be paying that much for it. |
|
Mark
B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel, GTH-L Simplicity Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not. |
|
![]() |
|
ILGLEANER ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Willow Hill,ILL Points: 6448 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds like alot of people are misinformed on the issue.
Comparing 100% makes no sense,no one is using it so there is no debate.
Oil is subsidized by the government just like ethanol.
Ethanol uses alot of water to produce. Oil uses just about the same amount of water per gallon.
You are not taking away from food when you use oil,your making towel heads in the middle east rich.
You are not taking very little from the food chain when using ethonal. DDG has more protien then corn ,after the process. Therefore you have less product with a higher feed value. You dont really loose much getting ethanol.
I think it is real easy. YOu can support the american farmer,or the middle eastern towel head.
I am a little biased.
IG
|
|
Education doesn't make you smart, it makes you educated.
|
|
![]() |
|
JohnCO ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Niwot Colo Points: 8992 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My neighbor put his name in at the local ethanol plant a couple years ago, he finally got on the list a few months ago. He gets one semi load a week. Has to be at the plant at a certain time on Saturday morning or he looses out for the week. As many have already said, ethanol is not the final answer but it is a step in the right direction. As for GM's 50 MPG V8, if it was practical, I suspect the cost would be lowered by high production numbers, thing is, they don't build very many V8's anymore, probably less then 25% of GM production is gas V8's
|
|
"If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer"
Allis Express participant |
|
![]() |
|
CTuckerNWIL ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22823 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Company's like GM make flex fuel motors which are designed to be more
efficient with ethanol blends. That is the result of design not the fuel
itself."
The auto industry has yet to build a production engine designed to run on ethanol. If it did, the efficiency would definitely increase. Flex fuel engines have to be able to burn gasoline and don't have the compression ratios needed to efficiently burn ethanol. They never will build an ethanol engine as long as Big Oil has hold of the EAR of our government or should I say hand in the pocket of our government. Ethanol is produced by extracting the starch from corn and converting it to alcohol. As far as I know, you can't live long on eating starch. It might help gravy stick to your ribs but is basically only carbohydrate. The left over distillers grain is a high fiber high protein by product perfectly suited to the livestock producer. Ethanol- no protein was used in the making of this product. Read this article. http://www.allaboutfeed.net/article-database/shedding-light-in-the-corn-for-fuel-or-food-debate-id1455.html "Dr. Terry Klopfenstein, an animal nutrition expert at the University of Nebraska, has concluded that the energy value of DDG when fed to cattle is as much as 145% of the original corn. He contends this feed credit needs to be calculated when determining the overall demand for corn for ethanol production." |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
![]() |
|
DMiller ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Location: Hermann, Mo Points: 32396 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nukes have never been subsidized no matter the hype been put out on it, coal either save for the current carbon sequestering system plants the Fed has to make work or fail miserably in the eyes of the other Kyoto Protocol countries.
I work in a Nuke, My company paid 2.3 BILLION in 1978 dollars to build it now we pay for any and all repairs to it along with any changes in regs the Fed system puts out to us. Security is a joke as to spending millions to protect from???????????? terror? they aren't sure; we spend millions more on mods the NRC comes up with whether they are proven or work or not either and we are stuck with the costs to do it regardless. Hydro hasn't been done in the US since the 70's and that was at a price of ethics for many in the Fed organizations. Wind is fruitless unless in hugemongous scale of numbers of units, solar is a whim and when the people that buy them figure it out they are going to be really mad at the sales pitch boys. |
|
![]() |
|
DMiller ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Location: Hermann, Mo Points: 32396 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a GM "FlexFuel Chevy, gets 19-21 on ethanol 26 on a good day on regular and 27 on mid grade, the math figures to me burning the same amount of actual gasoline on either regular or ethanol blend. |
|
![]() |
|
ncrc5315 ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Location: Nebraska Points: 68 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
NASCAR will be running E15 this year, and what their test have shown, is they get more horsepower, with the same milage. DOT studies have shown that blends in the 20% to 40% range actually gave better milage then straight gasoline or E10.
|
|
![]() |
|
ncrc5315 ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Location: Nebraska Points: 68 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's an idea, let's get rid of the tax breaks for ethanol, and oil. Then let's move the cost of ALL the associated military expenses for support of protecting the foreign oil supply from the general federal budget to the cost of gas, then let the consumer decide at the pump which one they want to support.
|
|
![]() |
|
CTuckerNWIL ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22823 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"I have a GM "FlexFuel Chevy, gets 19-21 on ethanol 26 on a good day on regular and 27 on mid grade, the math figures to me burning the same amount of actual gasoline on either regular or ethanol blend." Are you talking E85 or the 10% blend that everybody uses? I was just saying, I believe there is more that can be done to increase the efficiency of an alcohol burning engine. Right now car manufacturers have to build something that will burn gasoline because it is out there in the pumps and E85 may not be available everywhere. If they built an engine to be most efficient on E85 or better, it may not and probably wouldn't run worth a hoot on gasoline. Edited by CTuckerNWIL - 13 Feb 2011 at 5:21pm |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
![]() |
|
Lonn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29792 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We cut cereal out a couple years ago but not because corn was too high but a box of corn flakes is too high and it isn't too healthy either. Also we don't buy hot dogs or use fluoride toothpaste. Pop, both regular and diet, is another cut we are in the process of making although that one must be addictive cause it's turned out to be very difficult to stop drinking. Sorry, not totally on topic.
Edited by Lonn - 13 Feb 2011 at 5:23pm |
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
CTuckerNWIL ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22823 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tell me it isn't so Lonn. No Hot Dogs? My gosh, next thing you know, you'll be wanting to cut out Apple Pie. What's next? The Stars and Stripes. LOL
Cutting out the diet pop might be the best thing this whole country could do for itself. |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
![]() |
|
Gerald J. ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Hamilton Co, IA Points: 5636 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Besides the DDGs the corn oil is still available after using the starch to make sugar and then ethanol.
Gerald J. |
|
![]() |
|
Spud ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: North Dakota Points: 601 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Calvin Schmidt. You did not find a market for your corn. You lobbied the government to force people to buy it. You should have stopped over producing corn just like you say the livestock farmers should stop over producing.
Finding a market means offering something of value and letting people buy it based on it's merits perceived or otherwise.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |