![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
B Oil Filter Experiment |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345> |
Author | |
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87621 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
son, I have been an engineer twice as long as you and probably make twice the money you do....... That has nothing to do with the thread.
Your "professionalism" is lacking when you are told a DOZEN times that the filter system HAS NO PROBLEM.. It has worked for 75 years.. SOMEBODY SCREWED UP THE FILTER... Your " knowledge" says to buy a filter base for a "NEW" type filter, try to mount it to the motor, run additional oil lines, change the orifice, to fix a problem THAT DONT EXIST. I have told you several times in the last week that a new filter WILL DO NOTHING that the old filter cant do now.
You spent 3 pages talking about porting a head... GOOD JOB... there are 40 guys on this page that have done that also.. I have done a dozen of them in the last 20 years.
UPGRADES to an old tractor could be porting the head, taking 100 thousands off the head to up compression, adding an alternator, upgrading to 12 volts ... etc... those all have SOME value......... changing the bypass cotton filter to a bypass paper filter does NOTHING but spend time and MONEY and accomplish NOTHING.........
again, I am glad you have an engineering degree.... please don't assume that your the smartest one here.. There are a couple DOZEN very knolwedgable guys that pass out information and help and MOST are not Engineers.... My engineering degree NEVER taught me to port a head or lap valves.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Mrgoodwrench ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Location: CHICORA PA Points: 2087 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He's not gonna get it Steve
Tcmtech...there is nothing wrong with the b oiling system,plain and simple. The correct type of filter is readily available and inexpensive. Nothing needs fixed. That being said let's pretend the correct filters were obsolete, no we have an issue. Your solution would solve a pressure issueAnd keep it at 15 psi or so assuming the engine was mechanically sound. But what of flow. I'm not an engineer never claimed or wanted to be but I can listen to those with much more experience than me. That engine was designed to filter about 15% of the oil and return it to the pan, changing restrictions will change flow rate. By decreasing orifice size of filter Inlet the oil flow would have to decrease,correct? Where does that oil end up if not filtered and returned to pan? Maybe pumped into the valve train where it could lay in the valve cover because the drain back holes can't handle the extra volume? The system works. Always has. Bad filters were the only problem. If someone wanted to improve the oiling of a b at no expense spared then convert it to full pressure oiling otherwise the best thing you can do is use good oil and change it when recommended. |
|
There are 3 ways to do job GOOD, FAST, CHEAP. YOU MAY CHOOSE 2. If its FAST & CHEAP it won't be GOOD, if it's GOOD & CHEAP it won't be FAST, and if its GOOD & FAST it won't be CHEAP!!!!
|
|
![]() |
|
CrestonM ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8455 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess part of being an engineer is taking systems that work and improve them. (At least that's what a friend of mine told me last year) And that sounds like what Tcmtech is doing. Looking at a system that works (The B, C, CA oiling system) and making it work better with better results. It doesn't need to be done, but it would help the pressure I guess, although it does sound to me like his solution would decrease the volume of oil that goes through the filter.
Edited by CrestonM - 11 Sep 2016 at 8:56pm |
|
![]() |
|
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87621 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No Creston, it would not... a BRAND NEW 2016 full flow filter would do NOTHING for the tractor when installed as a bypass........ don't stick up for him, he refuses to read, listen , and understand the system... he just wants it to be his way........... go to his "ENGINEERING" link and read his comments about all the " dumb old guys on the Allis page that refuse to see his wisdom"....... even the guys on HIS PAGE are making fun of him.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21836 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The oil pressure gauge on the "bypass" filtering systems used on A-C engines, is basically reading the oil pressure being created at the filtering area. A dirty filter (cotton material) generally will read more oil pressure than a brand new cotton filter. A missing vertical tube will read lower oil pressure. A vertical tube pushed clear to the bottom of its bore can (sometimes) read very low oil pressure as well. Heavier viscosity of oil or lighter viscosity is another factor to consider. Now, this oil pressure reading was designed around the fact that the cotton string filter was to receive a certain volume of oil per minute to create this 10-12 psi number. So, the volume is determined by the condition of the oil pump, suction screen cleanliness, main bearing clearances, cam bearing clearances, oil viscosity, etc, etc. Anything that affects the volume being delivered to the filter (higher or lower) immediately shows on the gauge. Very low numbers at the bypass filter aren't necessarily the end of the world, as the internal components are still getting oil and at a pressure number that is probably acceptable. I can remember plowing on many a hot spring day with a pretty well worn WD-45 and the oil pressure needle was barely at "N" when hot and the engine ran like that for years. In short, when EVERYTHING inside the engine (including the oil pump) is NEW and tight, that is the best your oil pressure will ever be. From that day forward, as normal wear and tear starts deteriorating components, the oil pressure slowly begins to fall. THERE IS A REASON THE ENGINEERS NEVER HAD "NUMBERS" ON THOSE OIL PRESSURE GAUGES !!!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Tcmtech ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 15 Apr 2015 Location: Minot ND Points: 310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Exactly. I never said it had to be done my way or anyone else way. That part and comment I have made multiple times seems to escape a number of people's grasp here. I offered a plausible solution and that was it. No one had or has to implement anything. I simply took what information was at hand and offered up a theoretical solution to the filter design issue that would allow for a common low restriction filter to be used in place of the suposedly harder to find ones of stock design. Nothing more. To be honest if I had known so many here would take such great offence to the theory ( or just outrightly troll me over it) on one way of how it may be possible to redesign the system to work with different newer style filters I would have never participated to begin with. I wasn't aware that the AC B's oiling system was the golden calf and pinnacle of AC engineering. Now I know. Don't speak ill of the AC B oil filter system. They were made perfect and will always be perfect. ![]() My apologies to all. I thought I was on a forum where rational mechanically minded folk gathered to discuss how to fix their old machines and share ideas and findings about how to improve on their many inherent design flaws, shortcomings and the ever growing problem of finding/ fabrication newer parts to keep said machines alive and well. Clearly I was wrong in that thought and action. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87621 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree with most everything you said Dr ..... normal main and rod bearing wear will effect MOST engines... This particular B-C motor is spray lubed by pumping oil down the hollow cam shaft and spraying oil thru several holes in the shaft toward the piston, bearings and rod ends ...I cant say for sure, but most pressure loss in these motors is probably due to worn pump, plugged screen, sticking relief, bad cork plugs in the rocker arm shaft above the head, or improper installation of the 1/4 inch filter rod AS YOU SAID.... MOST other engines also loose pressure due to worn bearings.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tcmtech ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 15 Apr 2015 Location: Minot ND Points: 310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So you your over 100 years old now and still working? ![]() My job is in the oil fields so unless your pulling the upper side of $200K as an engineer I have doubts but hey, if you've been in the system for 80+ years I suppose it's possible. What was engineering for WWI like? ![]() As for my professionalism, well yea I guess compared to a 100+ year old engineer i'm still pretty wet behind the ears.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
dpower ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Madison Ne Points: 1578 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
LOL now that is funny.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tcmtech ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 15 Apr 2015 Location: Minot ND Points: 310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Um, actually it's the other way around. ![]() The general flow of the thread over there is way different than you seem to be recalling it and I too welcome anyone to come over and have a read and make the decision themself. ![]() Heck feel free to jump in! We are past the oil filters and up to discussing some pretty interesting old engine and vehicle designs. ![]() I've even thrown in some topics you can pick on me for. So far Steve seems to be failing miserably at it. I really expect better from a 100 year old engineer who makes $200K +
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87621 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
have you ever heard the saying " when you find yourself in a hole, put down the shovel"..
You would have been further ahead 3 pages ago to say " OH, I guess I didn't realize how the system works.. my bad"......... instead of 3 pages of BS "engineering" theory.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21836 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Main brgs are pressure lubed as are the cam bearings. Rod bearings are sprayed by holes in the hollow cam shaft.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tcmtech ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 15 Apr 2015 Location: Minot ND Points: 310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So on a more serious note. What exactly was their primary intent behind the engine design? Shear simplicity to work on or to be as cheaply manufactured as possible or what? I'm just asking being there are such huge variations in how engines for agricultural and related applications were made back then. Some elegantly simple, others to be as cheaply manufactured as possible and others way over engineered for what they had to do. I've read a lot aobut the history of the Allis Chalmers corporation as a whole, their industrial fabrication and manufacturing capabilities back then was incredible, but I can't say that I have ever seen a lot of detailed documentation into their agricultural branch and what went on behind the scenes there. Maybe I read the wrong history books but what I have seen about their worldwide manufacturing history almost always comes off as, 'Meh, we built some tractors and stuff too.' and that was it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Brian Jasper co. Ia ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Prairie City Ia Points: 10508 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I gotta ask a question. We can all agree that as produced the bypass system was adequate. How many microns was the cotton filter capable of catching and how many microns was the pleated paper filter capable of catching? My money is on the paper filter being able to catch smaller particles.
I'm going to make a guess that the people at Wix didn't know the original filter as designed had a Delta P that needs to be there. The paper cartridge has a lower Delta P than the cotton. Had they designed a restriction in the paper filter to bring the paper filter's Delta P up to the cotton filter, we'd all be using the paper filter.
|
|
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian." Henry Ford
|
|
![]() |
|
Lonn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29805 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Supposedly, as I was told in ag mechanics school, the cotton media filters more finely than most any pleated filter in that day.
|
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
Lonn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29805 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
CTuckerNWIL ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22825 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's pretty obvious you still don't understand the lube system on the CE engine. There never was a problem with low oil pressure with these few bad filters. The problem was no pressure, which happens if you don't restrict the flow. Since the is no "orifice" to restrict the flow, the cotton packed filter did that. There is no problem getting the proper filter for this system. Wix screwed up once many years ago but corrected that very soon after. "I started trying to explain that but it got shot apart pretty quickly because 'even a moron knows that the more restrictive the filter the better it's filtering'.
which in their world apparently leaves no room for modern low micron
count filters that use large pleated cloth surface area designs over
small surface area larger micron count packed cotton types. Personally this was my favorite response I got and I had to read it several times to get past the conflicting context. "He just doesn't understand plain English Steve. Pressure increase in this system will NOT help with lubing the engine,PERIOD. Opening a hole in the external oil line, like what happens when you put a pleated filter on a bypass system will eventually destroy the engine." So increasing oil pressure won't help the engine, period. Yet lack of pressure is what causes damage. What? Does that mean the engine is screwed no matter what is done?"I'm pretty wary of going after anyone until I am sure I know what I am dealing with. In engineering and mechanical work it's rare that anyone who has the mindset that makes them good at that sort of work is going to shoot their mouth off over dumb irrelevant stuff that could easily make themself look like a fool or worse.Looking at other comments on that post, I can see you like inventing problems that don't exist, like not being able to buy parts for these old engines. Anybody can buy almost any internal part for the Allis CE engine any day of the week. I was a tool maker, machinist, and machine tool repairman for most of my working career and have met a few "engineers" that couldn't see the problems they create even if you built it their way and showed em it didn't work. |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
![]() |
|
Lonn ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29805 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Has the topic has run it's course yet
![]() |
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
CTuckerNWIL ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22825 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes it has Lonn.
I came here this morning wanting to make a simple point, and got side-tracked. The point is, there was nothing wrong with the Allis BE-CE lube system till and "engineer" that didn't understand it, designed a new filter. ![]() Now I'm done. |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
![]() |
|
CrestonM ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8455 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the system works fine, but like any system, it can always be improved.
Just like if you look at 1953, you'll see a new WD-45. If you look at 1983, you'll see a new 4W-305. Both were the biggest A-C tractors during their time, but gradual changes to make the 50's tractors "better" over the years, led to the 4W-305. At least, that's my stance. In closure, yes, the B/C/CA oiling system, which serves it's purpose as intended, could be improved, but that's why we have later model tractors! ![]() Edited by CrestonM - 13 Sep 2016 at 10:56am |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21836 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As technology marched onward, more and more HP was derived from the same/similar cubic inch displacement. The next generation A-C engine(G-149/ D-14) from this small-block configuration, had oil pressure lubing of the connecting rod bearings, which the B-125 engine didn't have, but still retained the bypass filtering system. This was to keep a certain amount of reliability with the RPM and compression ratio increases. When the next G-149 engine was used in the D-15, RPM's and compression were increased again and now they went with full-flow oil filtering. So, each step of the way, changes were made to attain a certain level of service life and reliability. Engine technology has seen more and more improvements with better main/rod bearing materials, better/stronger crankshaft materials, turbocharging, intercooling, piston cooling, and on and on....In short, Engineers are given parameters to work within. Cost, performance and reliability would rank right up there as important criteria to meet. Bypass oil filtering was also used by Competitors to A-C, even utilizing the same exact cotton string filter. It was a good enough system for the times.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tcmtech ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 15 Apr 2015 Location: Minot ND Points: 310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's largely what engineers do. Take present designs that do work and expand and improve on them to make bigger, better, more efficient, more effective designs that surpass the old ones. If they didn't we would all still be picking at roots with pointy sticks like was done thousands of years ago rather than riding around in multi hundred HP turbo charged tractors with air conditioned comfort ride cabs, doing largely by ourselves, the equivalent work of what took thousands of workers to do by hand only a few hundred years ago. ![]() I have no issues with the B tractors bypass oiling system. It works well enough when the correct parts are being used. However obviously newer parts came out that did not work as the old ones and that was exactly what I was addressing in my theorization. Nothing more regardless of what a few others have managed to read into it and by god did they ever read a pile of stuff that was never there, directly implied, contextually or even in a weed induced stupor into it! ![]() I was simply commenting on how I would have approached this by the numbers in making a change to fix the issue that comes up when a different filter design than the stock one is used purposely or otherwise. The rest of my comments here was largely just defending myself from what I now know are the sites bitter barely litterate trolling ass hat clown committee (that upon further review might all be the same person who's running two or more fake member proxy accounts here?) that obviously separate their own personal experiences between good and bad engineers apart, just as many engineers can't separate their experiences between good and bad mechanics, and will never be pleased with what me or anyone who does not see the world as they do. ![]() Edited by Tcmtech - 13 Sep 2016 at 4:48pm |
|
![]() |
|
steve(ill) ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 87621 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
![]() |
|
jaybmiller ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Greensville,Ont Points: 24655 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well this has been interesting.... but I've come to appreciate
'it it ain't broke, don't need to fix it' .. leave well enough alone !! Obviously the 'B' engine has run fine and longer than a lot of guys have been alive. Yes, it can always be 'tweaked', 'upgrade', 'reengineered' but why bother? It was fine back in 39...still runs today. You just can't tweak this without looking at that or the other thing...domino effect. Now if you really want to 'tweak' or 'improve' a few things...fix the silly TPMS on every car so when you put snows on the computer doesn't keep chiming those tires are flat.... fix the idiotic inter computer bus on Dodge pickups...(BTW don't EVER run out of DEF in a new truck !).. make the end cap of the F150 gear shift NOT break off( I'm on #5...truck has 75,000 miles on it) ..tweak the adhesive applicating robot to put MORE goop on the rear window to SEAL it...and finally answer me WHY the Ford 'engineers' decided the radio antenna lead 'needed' not 1 or two or three but FOUR xmas tree clips along the 2 feet it runs! While you're at it I'd like them 'engineers' to come here and show me HOW to replace it without tearing the dash apart, in under 5 stinking HOT hours !! Yup, I have very,very , no , NO respect for them 'engineers'. Idiots..each and every one, they live in their computers NOT in the real World...they've never ,ever worked on anything they 'engineered'. You think I'm wrong? Come on up and replace the antenna cable...if you can do it 'by the book' in less than 5 hours. I'll give you 'Paris' ( D-14 #3). Jay |
|
3 D-14s,A-C forklift, B-112
Kubota BX23S lil' TOOT( The Other Orange Tractor) Never burn your bridges, unless you can walk on water |
|
![]() |
|
CrestonM ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8455 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Be glad for engineers, or you'd be walking everywhere and farming with sticks instead of big powerful trucks and tractors.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tcmtech ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 15 Apr 2015 Location: Minot ND Points: 310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am as much a wrench turner as anyone else here and I totally agree with your statement about idiotic unserviceable designs they put into stuff now so you can't blame me for the designs. ![]() I had and have nothing to do with any of it any more than say you as some random fellow wrench turner has any more responsibility for what some other ape armed half with fool that calls himself a mechanic does to anyone else's vehicle through their own ignorance. Undoing that crap as I come across it and to the best of my abilities on my and people I knows stuff is the area of my Applied engineering (hands on in the trenches Engineering would be a fair explanation) and mechanic work I spend most of my time and expertise in. ![]() BTW, when properly implemented Applied engineering is largely being the technical guy who works out on the production floor with the quality control staff and or with the mechanics/service people of the industry to try and keep that crap from ever being built or at least tries to see to it that less of it get built and it's about as well received and appreciated as what everyone saw here with my posts. ![]() On a good day something gets improved but on a typical day it's just an unending fight against misunderstandings and poorly received unthankfully taken out of context work based on others preconceived notions, bad past experiences, , unrealistic expectations and above all just an ongoing sheer ignorance of what it is they are dealing with and what it is an Applied engineering technicians job deals with. Applied technical engineers of all fields don't design a lot of things from the ground up themselves. They try to keep others poorly designed stuff from hitting the production floor or dealing with it once it hits that market. It's basically the middle guy between quality control or infield work and the desk jockey draftsman that never leave their offices to pick up a wrench and see how friggin impossible their 'perfect design' is to work on or service with common tools or components. ![]() Hell. many desk jockey draftsmen/engineers don't even acknowledge applied engineering technicians as even being an engineer in their own fields. To them their just a glorified pain in the ass wrench monkey that can continually question and point out the flaws in their all knowing and perfect work.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Mrgoodwrench ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Location: CHICORA PA Points: 2087 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The real problem with engineers is the same problem with doctors...do you know what they call the guy who graduated last in his class at engineering school?...engineer
Some are great and design things that make life better. Others are better at convincing others the what they have designed is better than it is. |
|
There are 3 ways to do job GOOD, FAST, CHEAP. YOU MAY CHOOSE 2. If its FAST & CHEAP it won't be GOOD, if it's GOOD & CHEAP it won't be FAST, and if its GOOD & FAST it won't be CHEAP!!!!
|
|
![]() |
|
WF owner ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 12 May 2013 Location: Bombay NY Points: 5012 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've been following this thread since the start and have remained silent, until now.
My opinion on this thread is that you guys (maybe one in particular) have changed (hijacked) what was a very informative thread about how different oil filters affect oil pressure on the B engine, to improving oil pressure on this particular engine, then to changing the complete oiling system and finally to opinions on engineers (I worked with engineers my entire career and fixed their mistakes that anyone with an ounce of common sense shouldn't have made...) If you guys want a new topic, please start a new thread!!! I, personally, was finding the original thread informative, but I am sick of the BS!!! |
|
![]() |
|
jaybmiller ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Greensville,Ont Points: 24655 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
re:
Be glad for engineers, or you'd be walking everywhere and farming with sticks instead of big powerful trucks and tractors. Well life was simpler back then, bet many here would like it ! Lot less problems too !! Jay |
|
3 D-14s,A-C forklift, B-112
Kubota BX23S lil' TOOT( The Other Orange Tractor) Never burn your bridges, unless you can walk on water |
|
![]() |
|
Gary Burnett ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Virginia Points: 3076 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm no engineer but I do know in any pressurized oil system that restricted flow means
pressure build up,more restricted the less the flow.In the case of the B oiling system seems like the more oil pressure the less amount of oil is being filtered as it has a bypass to let the extra oil thru directly back into the engine unfiltered.Now it seems to me the goal of the filtering system should be to filter the most oil possible so it seems that the filter that develops the less pressure would be the best as long as its doing the the job of filtering.In other words I would think it would be better to filter all the oil pretty good than just some of the oil better.To say the B oiling system was fine disputes what AC did later create a full flow oiling system that filtered all the oil if the B system had been fine they'd of never went to the full flow system. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |