This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity.
The Forum Parts and Services Unofficial Allis Store Tractor Shows Serial Numbers History
Forum Home Forum Home > Allis Chalmers > Farm Equipment
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


B engine3 rebuild problems.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: B engine3 rebuild problems.
    Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 3:13pm
Hi all, I am currently rebuilding the engine on my B. Reground crank, new bearings, new pistons, ring and liners etc. All parts have come from Steiner. 
The piston are 3 7/16 flat tops instead of the original 3 3/8 dished type, and the liners came in the same kit. I have got the bearings all set up, and the crank spins sweet, but, once I fit the rings, it goes real tight, and then when I also fit the head and the plugs, the compression is ridiculous, I can only just turn it on the handle and the starter hasn't got a chance. I've pulled it all apart several times now, and I have triple checked the timing is right, and everything is right and it's driving me nuts! 
The only thought I've had is to fit two head gaskets to lower the compression, and to use a big diesel battery to start it, and hope it loosens up with use, but any suggestions would be gratefully received. Many Thanks, Joe.
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
mlpankey View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Vols country
Points: 4580
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mlpankey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 3:17pm
sounds like not enough piston to cylinder wall clearance . did you check it if so how much did you have also what was youre rings end gaps ?
Back to Top
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 3:30pm
The ring gap is within tolerance, as the pistons and liners are all new, surely the clearance should be correct? 
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
mlpankey View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Vols country
Points: 4580
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mlpankey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 3:36pm
did the liners have a honed finish to them?  are you sure its not in the rod bearing clearnce and you got the rods turn correctly. they have a offset which makes two go one way and the other two go turned the oposite.

Edited by mlpankey - 29 Mar 2010 at 3:47pm
Back to Top
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 3:59pm
The liners have got the cross-hatch finish to them, and the rods are correct, long offset facing away from nearest main bearing.
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
mlpankey View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Vols country
Points: 4580
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mlpankey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 4:20pm
if numbers 1 and 3 long side of the bearing toward the flywheel and numbers 2 and 4 are toward the timing gear . thats correct . how much clearance was on the rod bearings. did you measure it or plastigauge it?   somethings definately wrong I would remove a piston at a time and see if it gets free. It could be one or collective making it tight but the engine should be able to be turned over by hand  with all four pistons and the head off it . You also mention the compression . did you advance the cam when you put it in by accident maybe?

Edited by mlpankey - 29 Mar 2010 at 4:21pm
Back to Top
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 4:26pm
I was extra careful to get the cam spot on, I'll have to go out tommorrow and go through the pistons one by one. Many Thanks.
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
Dick L View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Edon Ohio
Points: 5087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dick L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 6:35pm
Surely new pistons and rings would be correct.

Not on your life.

 Rings need to put down in the hole and checked with a feeler gage. That is unless you have never made a mistake. they probly came from China. Not often But I have found a wrong package of rings in a engine kit bought from NAPA.
How close to the two thousands clearance were you able to get with the plastigage on the rod bearings? 
Back to Top
Steve in NJ View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Andover, NJ
Points: 11887
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Steve in NJ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 8:56pm
When I did my B motor years ago, I had to do ALL the end gaps! Never assume it should be correct just because its a "kit". Mine was also a kit. I had to match everything to each hole. Spun nice once everything was to spec via the assembly manual. Took Dicks suggestion at the time and skinned .080 off the head also. Like Dick mentioned, make sure all your clearances are correct on the rods n' mains. Somethin's not right....
Steve@B&B 
Back to Top
Freewheelin View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 29 Sep 2009
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Freewheelin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 9:35pm
Joe,
Whatever you do don't force it.  You have too much time and $ invested.  Check the rod bearings and ring tolerances as the others have recommended.  Unfortunately China is supplying a lot of parts these days and they can't even spell process control. 
 
Take your time.  You'll find it. 
Back to Top
steve(ill) View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: illinois
Points: 82479
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote steve(ill) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 10:03pm
if you can spin the crank before put in the pistons, you need to narrow down if it is the rod bearings or the rings. loosen the rod caps 1/2 turn so you have a few thousands clearance in those 4 bearings, then try to rotate again. If still tight, its in the rings. I have seen rings contribute quite a bit of resistance even with the end gap right. Sometimes its just drag aginst a rough bore... but you should still be able to turn it, and starter would be no problem in turning.
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
Back to Top
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 2:13pm
Hi again, just removed the pistons. The ring gap is around 0.015, the manual quotes between 0.007 and 0.017 (although that figure is for 3 3/8 and not the new 3 7/16 pistons, would that make a difference?). Also, the gap between the piston and the cylinder wall is between 0.010 and 0.015. I checked this against an old piston and liner, and that one measured the same. One thing I did notice is that the old piston slides through is liner by hand, but the new one has to be tapped through.
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
ZAK.S.UK View Drop Down
Bronze Level
Bronze Level


Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ZAK.S.UK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 2:33pm
Hi joe if you cant find anything obvious get hold of mark everret he is in your neck of the woods he will be able to help im sure.
Back to Top
everett048 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: uk
Points: 619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote everett048 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 4:09pm
I may be wrong on this but 3.3/8 inch with simple working out = 84.65 mm
                                        3.7/16 inch                                 = 86.00 mm
                                                           difference                 =  1.35 mm
    or as near as i can figure if i am incorrect please tell me  so wrong pistons for sleeves???? hence why engine is tight?                            
Back to Top
Dick L View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Edon Ohio
Points: 5087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dick L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 5:36pm
Those are the (details) of checking parts before. .0015 to .002 is the clearance you want.
That lets the piston slide thru the liner. The liners could be out of round. Close enough to work by honing the sleeves.   Bad enough to return to the seller.  The rings are within spec but on the wide side of the specs. That takes hours off the total run time before another overhaul.


Back to Top
mlpankey View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Vols country
Points: 4580
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mlpankey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 6:45pm
 sounds like the sleeves need honed some more . the sleeve should be around .006bigger than the skirt of the piston.  a .006 feeler gauge should slide between the skirt and cylinder wall.As for the ring end gap I would rather be on the larger side than the tighter gap. The reason the old pistons slide in and out better is they have been ran and the heat shrinks them to a undersize value and its .062 smaller.  something is not adding up to me the old pistons are 62 thousandth smaller than the new ones . but with one of the new rings stuck into the cylinder and pushed down below the deck 1 inch with the old piston to ensure the ring is square you can stick a .015 thousandths feeler gauge between the rings gap.

Edited by mlpankey - 30 Mar 2010 at 7:13pm
Back to Top
Chalmersbob View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Points: 2122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chalmersbob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 8:50pm
I think that you should run a deglazer through the sleeves before installing the pistons.
That is what I was taught to do. You could also have a rod cap on the wrong rod. Don't ask me how I know that can cause the crank to be tight. Bob
Back to Top
steve(ill) View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: illinois
Points: 82479
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote steve(ill) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 9:04pm
your parts were not quality made. you should have .007-.010 ring gap on a new motor and .017 or so when it wears. Your already at .015 ... that will work, but too much for new....... Next, you piston should have .006 -.007 clearance to the liner. Yours has .015, that is too much,  but  the piston is tight in the bore meaning the bore is not round !  YOu can hone it MORE, but if your readings are right it is already too big.... THE circumference of a circle is 3 x the diameter , so if your bore was .010 instead of .015, that .005 smaller bore would make your ring gap .015 LESS which would be tight and you could file the end to fit................ basically they screwed up your liner bore, too big, and not round.
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
Back to Top
steve(ill) View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: illinois
Points: 82479
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote steve(ill) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 9:05pm
Honing the bore a couple thousands would make the pistons slide thru and that will work... but your making your ring gap bigger all the time.
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
Back to Top
Dick L View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Edon Ohio
Points: 5087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dick L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 6:17am
Sorry Fellows but you ain't putting any new pistons that diameter in any of my engines with a .006 to .007 clearance.  I was wrong on the .0015 to .002. I was thinking about the shim stock used over the clearance to check the clearance which is not the same thing.

The Allis Chalmers chart calls for .0025 to a max of .0045.


Back to Top
CTuckerNWIL View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: NW Illinois
Points: 22823
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CTuckerNWIL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 7:39am
I agree with Dick. Piston clearance is the difference between diameters of the OD of the piston and ID of the sleeve.  Sliding a .006 feeler gage down with the piston does not show .006 clearance. I think I would take an inside mic and check each cylinder for roundness. Check at least 3 places on each level and at least 3 different levels. And while you are that far, mic the pistons six ways from Sunday. They could be out of round although not too likely.


Edited by CTuckerNWIL - 31 Mar 2010 at 7:41am
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF
Back to Top
BrettPhillips View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Strasburg, VA
Points: 808
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BrettPhillips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 7:50am
Charlie and Dick have good points.  Also, those who say that you have too much ring gap are correct, but in your case this is not likely to be a factor in making the engine too tight.  Also, please remember that the piston skirts are not round, nor are they supposed to be.  Pistons are almost always cam ground at the skirt for a tighter fit at right angles to the wrist pin.  This may have a lot to do with why the old pistons fit easily, as they may be worn round or nearly so.
Back to Top
Ken in Texas View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Henderson, TX
Points: 5919
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ken in Texas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 9:53am
This happened to me once.  I had the thrust bearing lock up the crank when tightening it down even with a correct plastigauge reading. The problem was, the crank when turned got left with a small gullet on the journal next to the gear. Solution. Shaved the front edge of the bearing with a pocket knife so it cleared it and went on from there.
Back to Top
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 2:06pm
Hi again guys. Many Thanks for all your input. I'm beginning to think that the kit was manufactured by Mickey Mouse (or his Chinese cousin). I did some measuring today, and the liners are out of round by between 0.007 and 0.010, it's too cold in the shed today, so I haven't done any more, but I'm beginning to suspect the rod bearings are not what they should be either.
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
mlpankey View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Vols country
Points: 4580
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mlpankey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 3:53pm
Originally posted by CTuckerNWIL CTuckerNWIL wrote:

I agree with Dick. Piston clearance is the difference between diameters of the OD of the piston and ID of the sleeve.  Sliding a .006 feeler gage down with the piston does not show .006 clearance. I think I would take an inside mic and check each cylinder for roundness. Check at least 3 places on each level and at least 3 different levels. And while you are that far, mic the pistons six ways from Sunday. They could be out of round although not too likely.
  sliding the feeler gauge down by the bore and piston skirt shows the skirt clearance.    which means the piston can rock but it wouldnt slap. but it can also show a sleeve out of round especially if you trun the piston and stick the feeler gauge in several clock positions. I should have explain that better.  We do run the forged aluminum pistons a  little looser than the oem stock guys would like . loose is fast.
 The best way out of this is take youre old  sleeves put them back into the block have the sleeves bored and honed for the new 3 7/8  pistons. Cause you will have to much clearnce if you try to correct the out of round condition of the new sleeves. Also it is possible to have made the sleeves out of round when installing them so boring and honing after they have benn put into the block eliminates that .

Edited by mlpankey - 31 Mar 2010 at 4:11pm
Back to Top
kev/ont View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Castleton Ont
Points: 282
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kev/ont Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 8:39pm
Another thing to consider is the sleeve o-rings. I have seen in the past where an o-ring can roll when the sleeve is installed that will put the sleeve out of round enough to tighten the engine right up.
Back to Top
steve(ill) View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: illinois
Points: 82479
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote steve(ill) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 9:04pm
if you distort a steel liner by pushing it into a B block or getting the o-ring cauage, your not doing it right. THe steel liner will drop into the block with just hand pressure or less. AFter the o-ring is installed, you mught "push" it a little harder or tap with a mallet, but your not pushing NEAR hard enough to distort the liner.... Those lineres were BAD when they arrived unless you beat them in with a 5 pound hammer... was the block clean when  you "slid" them in?????
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
Back to Top
SteveC (NS) View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Location: Kentville,NS
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveC (NS) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 1:44pm
I once tried fitting USED liners and pistons w/rings into a block that had been frozen with water (no anti-freeze) in the jacket. I used new o-rings but had a devil of a time seating the liners into the block. Once I got around to fitting the pistons they tightened up like a frogs ear. I was lucky I only got that far because in the tear-down I noticed cracks in the block so even if I coulda  got it stareed it wouldn't have run long.
I did, however, take another block out of inventory and assemble it and it's still running in my B today.
So, it could be a distorted block, key is , like steve(ill) said, if you've gotta push in the liners with too much force, somethings wrong.
Back to Top
joegrgraham View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joegrgraham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 2:44pm
The liners went in without too much fuss, pushed in with the thumbs and just a little tap to seat them, so I think they must have been bad to begin with.
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
Back to Top
Dick L View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Edon Ohio
Points: 5087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dick L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 3:22pm
All Wet Sleeved Engines no matter the make or size, you need to be able to set the sleeve down without an O ring and turn it 360 degrees by hand. If you can not turn them by hand they are not fit correctly. Wet sleeves are not a press fit. If they were you would not need O rings. Fit them properly and let the O ring do its job.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.113 seconds.


Help Support the
Unofficial Allis Forum