This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
B engine3 rebuild problems. |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 29 Mar 2010 at 3:13pm |
Hi all, I am currently rebuilding the engine on my B. Reground crank, new bearings, new pistons, ring and liners etc. All parts have come from Steiner.
The piston are 3 7/16 flat tops instead of the original 3 3/8 dished type, and the liners came in the same kit. I have got the bearings all set up, and the crank spins sweet, but, once I fit the rings, it goes real tight, and then when I also fit the head and the plugs, the compression is ridiculous, I can only just turn it on the handle and the starter hasn't got a chance. I've pulled it all apart several times now, and I have triple checked the timing is right, and everything is right and it's driving me nuts! The only thought I've had is to fit two head gaskets to lower the compression, and to use a big diesel battery to start it, and hope it loosens up with use, but any suggestions would be gratefully received. Many Thanks, Joe.
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
mlpankey
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Vols country Points: 4580 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
sounds like not enough piston to cylinder wall clearance . did you check it if so how much did you have also what was youre rings end gaps ?
|
|
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The ring gap is within tolerance, as the pistons and liners are all new, surely the clearance should be correct?
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
mlpankey
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Vols country Points: 4580 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
did the liners have a honed finish to them? are you sure its not in the rod bearing clearnce and you got the rods turn correctly. they have a offset which makes two go one way and the other two go turned the oposite.
Edited by mlpankey - 29 Mar 2010 at 3:47pm |
|
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The liners have got the cross-hatch finish to them, and the rods are correct, long offset facing away from nearest main bearing.
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
mlpankey
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Vols country Points: 4580 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
if numbers 1 and 3 long side of the bearing toward the flywheel and numbers 2 and 4 are toward the timing gear . thats correct . how much clearance was on the rod bearings. did you measure it or plastigauge it? somethings definately wrong I would remove a piston at a time and see if it gets free. It could be one or collective making it tight but the engine should be able to be turned over by hand with all four pistons and the head off it . You also mention the compression . did you advance the cam when you put it in by accident maybe?
Edited by mlpankey - 29 Mar 2010 at 4:21pm |
|
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I was extra careful to get the cam spot on, I'll have to go out tommorrow and go through the pistons one by one. Many Thanks.
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
Dick L
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Edon Ohio Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Surely new pistons and rings would be correct.
Not on your life. Rings need to put down in the hole and checked with a feeler gage. That is unless you have never made a mistake. they probly came from China. Not often But I have found a wrong package of rings in a engine kit bought from NAPA. How close to the two thousands clearance were you able to get with the plastigage on the rod bearings? |
|
Steve in NJ
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Andover, NJ Points: 11887 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
When I did my B motor years ago, I had to do ALL the end gaps! Never assume it should be correct just because its a "kit". Mine was also a kit. I had to match everything to each hole. Spun nice once everything was to spec via the assembly manual. Took Dicks suggestion at the time and skinned .080 off the head also. Like Dick mentioned, make sure all your clearances are correct on the rods n' mains. Somethin's not right....
Steve@B&B |
|
Freewheelin
Silver Level Joined: 29 Sep 2009 Points: 60 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Joe,
Whatever you do don't force it. You have too much time and $ invested. Check the rod bearings and ring tolerances as the others have recommended. Unfortunately China is supplying a lot of parts these days and they can't even spell process control.
Take your time. You'll find it.
|
|
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 82479 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
if you can spin the crank before put in the pistons, you need to narrow down if it is the rod bearings or the rings. loosen the rod caps 1/2 turn so you have a few thousands clearance in those 4 bearings, then try to rotate again. If still tight, its in the rings. I have seen rings contribute quite a bit of resistance even with the end gap right. Sometimes its just drag aginst a rough bore... but you should still be able to turn it, and starter would be no problem in turning.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi again, just removed the pistons. The ring gap is around 0.015, the manual quotes between 0.007 and 0.017 (although that figure is for 3 3/8 and not the new 3 7/16 pistons, would that make a difference?). Also, the gap between the piston and the cylinder wall is between 0.010 and 0.015. I checked this against an old piston and liner, and that one measured the same. One thing I did notice is that the old piston slides through is liner by hand, but the new one has to be tapped through.
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
ZAK.S.UK
Bronze Level Joined: 15 Sep 2009 Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi joe if you cant find anything obvious get hold of mark everret he is in your neck of the woods he will be able to help im sure.
|
|
everett048
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: uk Points: 619 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I may be wrong on this but 3.3/8 inch with simple working out = 84.65 mm
3.7/16 inch = 86.00 mm
difference = 1.35 mm
or as near as i can figure if i am incorrect please tell me so wrong pistons for sleeves???? hence why engine is tight?
|
|
Dick L
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Edon Ohio Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Those are the (details) of checking parts before. .0015 to .002 is the clearance you want.
That lets the piston slide thru the liner. The liners could be out of round. Close enough to work by honing the sleeves. Bad enough to return to the seller. The rings are within spec but on the wide side of the specs. That takes hours off the total run time before another overhaul. |
|
mlpankey
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Vols country Points: 4580 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
sounds like the sleeves need honed some more . the sleeve should be around .006bigger than the skirt of the piston. a .006 feeler gauge should slide between the skirt and cylinder wall.As for the ring end gap I would rather be on the larger side than the tighter gap. The reason the old pistons slide in and out better is they have been ran and the heat shrinks them to a undersize value and its .062 smaller. something is not adding up to me the old pistons are 62 thousandth smaller than the new ones . but with one of the new rings stuck into the cylinder and pushed down below the deck 1 inch with the old piston to ensure the ring is square you can stick a .015 thousandths feeler gauge between the rings gap.
Edited by mlpankey - 30 Mar 2010 at 7:13pm |
|
Chalmersbob
Orange Level Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Pennsylvania Points: 2122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think that you should run a deglazer through the sleeves before installing the pistons.
That is what I was taught to do. You could also have a rod cap on the wrong rod. Don't ask me how I know that can cause the crank to be tight. Bob
|
|
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 82479 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
your parts were not quality made. you should have .007-.010 ring gap on a new motor and .017 or so when it wears. Your already at .015 ... that will work, but too much for new....... Next, you piston should have .006 -.007 clearance to the liner. Yours has .015, that is too much, but the piston is tight in the bore meaning the bore is not round ! YOu can hone it MORE, but if your readings are right it is already too big.... THE circumference of a circle is 3 x the diameter , so if your bore was .010 instead of .015, that .005 smaller bore would make your ring gap .015 LESS which would be tight and you could file the end to fit................ basically they screwed up your liner bore, too big, and not round.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 82479 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Honing the bore a couple thousands would make the pistons slide thru and that will work... but your making your ring gap bigger all the time.
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
Dick L
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Edon Ohio Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sorry Fellows but you ain't putting any new pistons that diameter in any of my engines with a .006 to .007 clearance. I was wrong on the .0015 to .002. I was thinking about the shim stock used over the clearance to check the clearance which is not the same thing.
The Allis Chalmers chart calls for .0025 to a max of .0045. |
|
CTuckerNWIL
Orange Level Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: NW Illinois Points: 22823 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree with Dick. Piston clearance is the difference between diameters of the OD of the piston and ID of the sleeve. Sliding a .006 feeler gage down with the piston does not show .006 clearance. I think I would take an inside mic and check each cylinder for roundness. Check at least 3 places on each level and at least 3 different levels. And while you are that far, mic the pistons six ways from Sunday. They could be out of round although not too likely.
Edited by CTuckerNWIL - 31 Mar 2010 at 7:41am |
|
http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF |
|
BrettPhillips
Orange Level Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Strasburg, VA Points: 808 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Charlie and Dick have good points. Also, those who say that you have too much ring gap are correct, but in your case this is not likely to be a factor in making the engine too tight. Also, please remember that the piston skirts are not round, nor are they supposed to be. Pistons are almost always cam ground at the skirt for a tighter fit at right angles to the wrist pin. This may have a lot to do with why the old pistons fit easily, as they may be worn round or nearly so.
|
|
Ken in Texas
Orange Level Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Henderson, TX Points: 5919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This happened to me once. I had the thrust bearing lock up the crank when tightening it down even with a correct plastigauge reading. The problem was, the crank when turned got left with a small gullet on the journal next to the gear. Solution. Shaved the front edge of the bearing with a pocket knife so it cleared it and went on from there.
|
|
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi again guys. Many Thanks for all your input. I'm beginning to think that the kit was manufactured by Mickey Mouse (or his Chinese cousin). I did some measuring today, and the liners are out of round by between 0.007 and 0.010, it's too cold in the shed today, so I haven't done any more, but I'm beginning to suspect the rod bearings are not what they should be either.
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
mlpankey
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Vols country Points: 4580 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Edited by mlpankey - 31 Mar 2010 at 4:11pm |
|
kev/ont
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Castleton Ont Points: 282 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Another thing to consider is the sleeve o-rings. I have seen in the past where an o-ring can roll when the sleeve is installed that will put the sleeve out of round enough to tighten the engine right up.
|
|
steve(ill)
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: illinois Points: 82479 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
if you distort a steel liner by pushing it into a B block or getting the o-ring cauage, your not doing it right. THe steel liner will drop into the block with just hand pressure or less. AFter the o-ring is installed, you mught "push" it a little harder or tap with a mallet, but your not pushing NEAR hard enough to distort the liner.... Those lineres were BAD when they arrived unless you beat them in with a 5 pound hammer... was the block clean when you "slid" them in?????
|
|
Like them all, but love the "B"s.
|
|
SteveC (NS)
Silver Level Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Location: Kentville,NS Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I once tried fitting USED liners and pistons w/rings into a block that had been frozen with water (no anti-freeze) in the jacket. I used new o-rings but had a devil of a time seating the liners into the block. Once I got around to fitting the pistons they tightened up like a frogs ear. I was lucky I only got that far because in the tear-down I noticed cracks in the block so even if I coulda got it stareed it wouldn't have run long.
I did, however, take another block out of inventory and assemble it and it's still running in my B today.
So, it could be a distorted block, key is , like steve(ill) said, if you've gotta push in the liners with too much force, somethings wrong.
|
|
joegrgraham
Silver Level Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Wiltshire, UK Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The liners went in without too much fuss, pushed in with the thumbs and just a little tap to seat them, so I think they must have been bad to begin with.
|
|
If it seems like a good idea, do it. It's easier to apologise than to get permission.
|
|
Dick L
Orange Level Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Edon Ohio Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
All Wet Sleeved Engines no matter the make or size, you need to be able to set the sleeve down without an O ring and turn it 360 degrees by hand. If you can not turn them by hand they are not fit correctly. Wet sleeves are not a press fit. If they were you would not need O rings. Fit them properly and let the O ring do its job.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |