![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
| The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History | |
what did 450 loader go on |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
HudCo
Orange Level
Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Location: Plymouth Utah Points: 3952 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: what did 450 loader go onPosted: 31 Jan 2025 at 10:01am |
|
what tractors would a 450 loader come or fit on the best ? found nice one and thinking about putting on my d17 but only if it lookes like it was made for it not to big not to small
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 11:01am |
|
5040-5045-5050 would be my guess. Does it have a pump?? The 5000 series pump went behind the seat just above the pto shield.
|
|
![]() |
|
HudCo
Orange Level
Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Location: Plymouth Utah Points: 3952 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 11:16am |
|
this one has four hoses with male couplers, sound like the frame maybe a little small my tractor , i did score a three spool valve for the left side off of a salvage series 1 d17d tractor to run it that way, or a pto pump and another valve stack
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 12:00pm |
|
The 5040-45-50 loader had a tank on the left tower, PTO pump and a valve stack on the left side. Those tractors had zero hydraulics on them. The loader was self-contained like a WD45 would have been.
|
|
![]() |
|
Allis dave
Orange Level
Joined: 10 May 2012 Location: Northern IN Points: 3074 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 1:34pm |
|
I don't know about the loader, but neat find on the 3 spool valve!
|
|
![]() |
|
cjarosz
Bronze Level
Joined: 22 Nov 2009 Location: Columbus, IN Points: 107 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 5:57pm |
|
We had a 5050 fwa and a 400 loader, as dr said tank was in the rh tower and valves were attached to it as well so it would run with right had. Extremely rugged and would dig to China. Had to replace pump and retrofit a new valve since it had been discontinued and finding the pump to mount above the pto was challenging but it would outperform just about anything today if the tractor had a shuttle like the Kubota that replaced it that would have been the perfect scoop tractor
|
|
![]() |
|
HudCo
Orange Level
Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Location: Plymouth Utah Points: 3952 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 6:36pm |
|
no valve stack. i cant see any fill, high leval or drain plugs on the towers , looking at the pictures . i know the other laoders have the tank in the tower. but i will have them send me some differant pictures . the bucket real straight and does not look abused
|
|
![]() |
|
Kenny L.
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: NEIOWA Points: 1363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 9:45pm |
|
Hubco I'm going to say you're looking at a 460 loader which would be for a 6000 series tractor, the 5000 series tractor use a 400 loader D14 414 D15 415 WD & WD45 445 D17 series was the 417 and the 517 was for D-17IV and the 519 was for D-19 the 500 loader will all so work on 170,175,180,185and 190. this's my understanding of the loader from the book I've on allis loader but I could be wrong. HTH
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jan 2025 at 9:56pm |
|
Everything about the "400" series loader made for the 5040-45-50 is different when it comes to how it hangs/fits on the tractor. A ton of fabrication would be required (I think) to make it fit a D-14-15-17. So much so, I don't think it's worth doing.
|
|
![]() |
|
Gary Burnett
Orange Level Access
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Virginia Points: 3102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Feb 2025 at 11:48am |
|
I have 2 tractors with the Fiat style loaders and a D17 I compared them to.It would take some work and fitting to put one on the D17 but not crazy hard.Would have to drill the side plates up beside the motor on the D17 or weld a bracket.Standard loader hangers would work on the back.Hydraulics would have to be worked out for sure.
|
|
![]() |
|
Brian G. NY
Orange Level
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: 12194 Points: 2269 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Feb 2025 at 3:54pm |
|
I have an owner's manual: FARM LOADER
Model 450 For 6140 Tractors That's not to say the model is not used on other tractors as well. The D-17 looks like "a whole 'nother animal" compared to the 6140. |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Feb 2025 at 7:12pm |
|
6140 was a Japanese built big brother to the 5020-5030. While at 40 HP I think it was possibly a little smaller physically than a 5040-45-50 Fiat. Again, much fabrication would be needed as all four of these tractors had no side frames like the D-series did.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |