Powerdirector clutches in a 180, 190
Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Other Topics
Forum Name: Pulling Forum
Forum Description: Forum dedicated to Tractor and Garden Pulling
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=55742
Printed Date: 22 Nov 2024 at 11:21pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Powerdirector clutches in a 180, 190
Posted By: DougG
Subject: Powerdirector clutches in a 180, 190
Date Posted: 23 Aug 2012 at 2:04pm
|
I was talking to a guy who used to pull a hot 180 , i bought some parts from him, anyway he said that he used an electric actuator to engage the clutch packs on the PD , and had a seperate hyd oil setup to engage the packs with hyd pressure ; he said the clutches hold better running dry - anyone do this , they seem kinda fragile i would think running in oil would be better ??
|
Replies:
Posted By: D-17_Dave
Date Posted: 23 Aug 2012 at 8:55pm
I won't comment on what way is better for competition pulling but look at the design. Oil flow I think was primarily for cooling but oil obviously provides some lubrication, so where do you draw a line between the needed friction when pulling more power through the clutch than designed......
I have heard of several guys removing the power director clutch due to slipping. I have an oem coupling out of a tranny that never had a wet clutch.
-------------
Yea, I can fix that.....
|
Posted By: DougG
Date Posted: 24 Aug 2012 at 7:21am
|
My biggest concern would be the clutch disc breaking from heat , dont want to be in there every week replacing disc! !But maybe they were using a better material than stock
|
Posted By: TramwayGuy
Date Posted: 27 Aug 2012 at 12:12pm
If they aren't slipping, they don't generate heat.
Rockford used to have two ratings for their clutches like the ones used in WD hand clutch and oliver pto clutches. One was dry and one wet. Dry was much more torque capable, but wet was much longer life when used to modulate speed.
|
|