Chevrolet Nova
Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Other Topics
Forum Name: Shops, Barns, Varmints, and Trucks
Forum Description: anything you want to talk about except politics
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=206762
Printed Date: 20 Aug 2025 at 9:06am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Chevrolet Nova
Posted By: BuckSkin
Subject: Chevrolet Nova
Date Posted: 18 May 2025 at 2:13am
Saturday_22-March-2025
1963 ChevyII Nova SS
https://ibb.co/spJMF6hD" rel="nofollow">
http://https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Chevy_II_/_Nova" rel="nofollow - - HERE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Chevy_II_/_Nova
https://www.ss396.com/cars/generations-of-the-chevrolet-nova/
https://ibb.co/7tmTWHmK" rel="nofollow">
|
Replies:
Posted By: DonBC
Date Posted: 19 May 2025 at 12:28pm
Years ago a relative was so impressed by his Nova car that he named his first born daughter Nova.
------------- Jack of all trades, master of none
|
Posted By: BuckSkin
Date Posted: 19 May 2025 at 1:37pm
DonBC wrote:
Years ago a relative was so impressed by his Nova car that he named his first born daughter Nova. |
She had best be glad that he didn't like Studebakers.
|
Posted By: iowallis
Date Posted: 19 May 2025 at 8:00pm
GM’s divisions spin offs of the Nova-
Chevrolet Nova Oldsmobile Omega Pontiac Ventura Buick Apollo
|
Posted By: DMiller
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 3:30am
My Aunt had a 1965 Malibu, a Nicer version Nova of the day, Brother had a 71 Pontiac Ventura II 6cyl Power Glide, sold it to Grandmother as her 55 Bel Aire Had To Go, without PS or Power Brakes and three on tree she could barely manage. Then he bought a 74 Nova, 6 and three on column, do NOT know why as had NO AC, No PS, did have Power Brakes.
|
Posted By: BuckSkin
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 3:39am
DMiller wrote:
My Aunt had a 1965 Malibu, a Nicer version Nova of the day,. |
If my understanding is correct, the Malibu was a Chevelle; a bigger car than the Nova.
You should have hung on to the '55 Belaire.
|
Posted By: DMiller
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 10:49am
Not by Much but correct. Most running gear was compatible from either to either.
|
Posted By: Codger
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 11:12am
Chevelle was the "A" body platform.
Camaro was the "F" body platform.
As typical GM at the time, many items universally fit most of their platforms.
------------- That's All Folks!
|
Posted By: BuckSkin
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 11:27am
Codger wrote:
Chevelle was the "A" body platform.
Camaro was the "F" body platform.
As typical GM at the time, many items universally fit most of their platforms.
|
Correct me if I am wrong; Chevelle and Nova had a full frame and the Camaro frame stopped under the front floor-board and was unibody from there on back, right ?
Or, were the 67-69 Camaros full-frame and the half-frame started in 70 ?
|
Posted By: TedN
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 12:04pm
Camaro and Nova were unibody throughout production. Chevelle had a full frame, at least through the 70s.
------------- 190XTD seriesIII, 190XTD seriesI, maroon belly 7000, 190XTD series??? project(or maybe parts)
|
Posted By: Ed (Ont)
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 2:14pm
All Camaro cars had 1/2 frame. Ended almost even with back of trans. Transmission cross member bolted to top of frame and close to end of frame. Back of car was I guess a kind of unibody. Front was regular design heavy frame same as their bigger cars. So kind of a hybrid deal. 😀😀
|
Posted By: plummerscarin
Date Posted: 20 May 2025 at 3:38pm
Nova was X-body. Front frame stub bolted to uni-body. Similar to Camaro
|
Posted By: Steve in NJ
Date Posted: 21 May 2025 at 9:31am
Here's Jo Jo's Grocery getter. 67' Nova Wagon. I dropped a 4.3L Vortec V6 in for her with a pair of Weber Carburetors.
------------- 39'RC, 43'WC, 48'B, 49'G, 50'WF, 65 Big 10, 67'B-110, 75'716H, 2-620's, & a Motorhead wife
|
Posted By: plummerscarin
Date Posted: 21 May 2025 at 12:09pm
Sweet ride. Show us the induction set up
|
Posted By: jdeere562
Date Posted: 21 May 2025 at 5:11pm
Posted By: jdeere562
Date Posted: 21 May 2025 at 5:12pm
Posted By: jdeere562
Date Posted: 21 May 2025 at 5:13pm
Posted By: Steve in NJ
Date Posted: 22 May 2025 at 12:36pm
Love them early Chevy II's! Here's a pic of the engine when it was going together. It doesn't take her to long to get to the store....
------------- 39'RC, 43'WC, 48'B, 49'G, 50'WF, 65 Big 10, 67'B-110, 75'716H, 2-620's, & a Motorhead wife
|
Posted By: plummerscarin
Date Posted: 22 May 2025 at 3:24pm
|