![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
| The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History | |
Whats the deal with the 8000 line? |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
twinsonfarm
Silver Level
Joined: 05 Aug 2019 Location: IL Points: 129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Whats the deal with the 8000 line?Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 12:31pm |
|
What is the deal with the 8000 line of Allis tractors? They all seem to be lower HP than their 7000 series counterparts. Up until this point, HP always increased into the newer models?
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
DougG
Orange Level
Joined: 20 Sep 2009 Location: Mo Points: 8369 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 4:38pm |
|
where did you get your,info ?
Edited by DougG - 09 Dec 2019 at 8:06am |
|
![]() |
|
CrestonM
Orange Level
Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8457 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 4:46pm |
|
I think he might be talking about, in example, the 7060 having 160 hp, but the 8050 having 150. Same with 7080 at 180 and 8070 at 170.
I think he may be asking why did they not go from 7060 to 8060 and 7080 to 8080 or bigger.
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 5:23pm |
|
FWA caused engines to work much harder (because tractor was glued to the ground), so HP was de-rated to try and keep decent engine life.
|
|
![]() |
|
twinsonfarm
Silver Level
Joined: 05 Aug 2019 Location: IL Points: 129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 6:00pm |
Yup, that's how I should of worded it. Thank you.
|
|
![]() |
|
victoryallis
Orange Level
Joined: 15 Apr 2010 Location: Ludington mi Points: 2878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 6:18pm |
|
They had enough issues keeping the 7080 and 7580 motors together backing things off may be prudent.
|
|
|
8030 and 8050MFWD, 7580, 3 6080's, 160, 7060, 175, heirloom D17, Deere 8760
|
|
![]() |
|
injpumpEd
Orange Level Access
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: Walnut IL Points: 5115 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 Dec 2019 at 6:47pm |
|
They kinda re-aligned the hp ratings, in anticipation for a new 200 hp 8095. The 426 was a great engine, but really should have been made as a 466 cid engine for the 160+ hp tractors I feel. The 516 was just too big, old, and heavy, not to mention expensive, for a wheel tractor. It is still surprising they used them in the N7's.
|
|
|
210 "too hot to farm" puller, part of the "insane pumpkin posse". Owner of Guenther Heritage Diesel, specializing in fuel injection systems on heritage era tractors. stock rebuilds to all out pullers!
|
|
![]() |
|
NEVER green
Orange Level Access
Joined: 28 Feb 2013 Location: MN. Points: 8669 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Dec 2019 at 8:17am |
|
In the 8000 they put in the heavier rods which helped. |
|
|
2-8050 1-7080 6080 D-19 modelE & A 7040 R50
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Dec 2019 at 9:05am |
|
The connecting rod thing was two-fold. They wanted a larger diameter piston pin. That meant changing the piston from 4-rings to 3-rings to keep the overall height the same. The piston cooling was then run up thru a passage drilled in the beam of the rod itself. I assume this type of piston cooling was a little better and maybe helped with oil consumption ?? You'd think the new rod was a little stronger as well, but I can't say I ever had an old rod fail.
|
|
![]() |
|
rieg
Silver Level
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Location: swoh Points: 364 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Dec 2019 at 8:02pm |
|
Every 426 that I have rebuilt seemed that its limiting factor to life span was the rod bearings. Not saying that there aren't other failures but the rod bearings have always been wore out. I have a recently acquired an 8050 that has over 7000 hours and supposedly never been apart, and it looks it. I am interested to see what those rod bearing look like. Regardless I really like the 426.
|
|
|
rieg
|
|
![]() |
|
fourthgeneration
Bronze Level
Joined: 03 Jan 2017 Location: ohio Points: 170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Dec 2019 at 10:18pm |
|
Just better. Evolution if you will. I like that it was never intended to be an open station. Things are just improved over everything that can before it.
Edited by fourthgeneration - 09 Dec 2019 at 10:21pm |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Dec 2019 at 8:23am |
|
When you look at those 8050 rod bearing shells, the date the brg was built is usually stamped on the backside.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |