![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
| The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History | |
gleaner corn head |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Tony Elo
Orange Level
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: guelph ontario Points: 256 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: gleaner corn headPosted: 10 Jul 2011 at 4:57pm |
|
Does anybody know if a 430 corn head of an F will fit a K? |
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22114 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 6:36pm |
|
No, and if you made it fit you couldn't pick it up off the ground.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tony Elo
Orange Level
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: guelph ontario Points: 256 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 7:54pm |
|
thanks for the reply doctor,i guess i just saved myself a day at the auction
|
|
![]() |
|
ranger42
Orange Level
Joined: 14 Mar 2011 Points: 420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 9:09pm |
|
Did they offer a 4-30 head on a K-2? I always wondered how it handled it because we had a 2 row on our K-2 and it was plenty in heavy corn.
|
|
![]() |
|
CORLEWFARM
Bronze Level Access
Joined: 25 Jan 2011 Points: 115 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 9:56pm |
|
THEY DID OFFER A 430 BUT TOO MUCH FOR A K
|
|
![]() |
|
Dave (Mid-MI)
Orange Level
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Hemlock, MI Points: 569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 10:10pm |
|
The four row corn head was available on the long back K-2's as these had heavier drive axles and final drives, as well as more rear weight. Even then, they required a heavy beam under the axle, and I think also bigger lift cylinders. Weights were also required on the rear axle/wheels.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |