This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
XT 190 Hydrolic pump |
Post Reply |
Author | |
mark vaughn
Silver Level Joined: 07 Dec 2011 Points: 63 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 9:59pm |
Can someone explain the difference in the early model and late model XT 190 hydrolic pumps and which pump is better.
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
mark vaughn
Silver Level Joined: 07 Dec 2011 Points: 63 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Can you help me on my question DR ALLIS.
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The original design pump was a triple section gear type (three pumps stacked together as one). One section for the 3pt and remote outlets.....one for power steering AND Power Director (hand clutch) and if equipped, the hydraulic PTO clutch. The last and smallest section was for the Traction Booster weight transfer system that worked thru the 3pt hitch arms only. Performance was very good even at low engine speeds because each pump was independent. Downside was lots of probable places to leak/seep oil in-between each section and I would imagine cost of production. The later design was one large gear pump section (with a flow divider) and the smaller Traction Booster pump section. These worked well but usually required a little more throttle to get the hitch or remotes to lift a load from idle. Notice both pumps always kept the Traction Booster idependent so nothing else affected it's output. The original triple pump design also (in my opinion) was to try and combat the John Deere 4010 closed center hydraulic system design propaganda that had been going on since 1961.
|
|
MACK
Orange Level Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Points: 7664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Early pump had a manifold bolted to back with flowdivider and PS relief valve in it. The later had the PS relief valve and flowdivider made in it.
As far as to which is best, which ever is on your tractor is the one you about have to use. Could use later on older tractor but would take some pluming and different mounting housing on front of pump. MACK
|
|
Joe(TX)
Orange Level Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Weatherford. TX Points: 1682 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The early pump did not have a flow divider. It was a 3 section pump like Dr Allis stated. The flow divider on the later is on the back of the pump along with the ps releif.
The biggest problem with the later pump is the flow divider not working.
|
|
1970 190XT, 1973 200, 1962 D-19 Diesel, 1979 7010, 1957 WD45, 1950 WD, 1961 D17, Speed Patrol, D14, All crop 66 big bin, 180 diesel, 1970 170 diesel, FP80 forklift. Gleaner A
|
|
stray
Orange Level Joined: 16 Aug 2011 Location: Tipton, Missour Points: 323 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Does anyone know when the later pump started being used?
|
|
1969 190XT series 3
|
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 20496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Very late series 3 190XT's....it was at a certain s/n....you'll know it when you see it because it's the same as a 200.
|
|
mark vaughn
Silver Level Joined: 07 Dec 2011 Points: 63 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thank you for your responces and answers to my question . You all have been a great help help with your answers and i learned a lot. thank yall very much and have a MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |